public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: multi-domain PCI and sysfs
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:38:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e47339104090518387bdf2d0a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409051706.50455.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>

Another way to look at this would be to create one vga device per
domain. I could then hook the vga=0/1 attribute off from this device
and avoid the problem of creating domain nodes under /sys/devices


On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 17:06:50 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 5, 2004 4:04 pm, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 04:03:56PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Saturday, September 4, 2004 3:45 pm, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > > Is this a multipath configuration where pci0000:01 and pci0000:02 can
> > > > both get to the same target bus? So both busses are top level busses?
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to figure out where to stick the vga=0/1 attribute for
> > > > disabling all the VGA devices in a domain. It's starting to look like
> > > > there isn't a single node in sysfs that corresponds to a domain, in
> > > > this case there are two for the same domain.
> > >
> > > Yes, I think that's the case.  Matthew would probably know for sure
> > > though.
> >
> > Huh, eh, what?  There's no such thing as multipath PCI configurations.
> > The important concepts in PCI are:
> 
> Right, but I was answering his question about whether or not there was a place
> to stick his 'vga' control file on a per-domain basis.  There would be if the
> layout was something like this:
> 
> /sys/devices/pciDDDD/BB/SS.F/foo
> rather than the current
> /sys/devices/pciDDDD:BB/DDDD:BB:SS.F/foo
> 
> > I haven't really looked at the VGA attribute.  I think Ivan or Grant
> > would be better equipped to help you on this front.  I remember them
> > rehashing it 2-3 years ago.
> 
> I'm actually ok with a system wide vga arbitration driver, assuming that we'll
> never have to worry about the scalability of stuff that wants to do legacy
> vga I/O.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jesse
> 
> 



-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-06  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-04 20:00 multi-domain PCI and sysfs Jon Smirl
2004-09-04 21:57 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-04 22:12   ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-04 22:27     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-04 22:45       ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-04 23:03         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-05 23:04           ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-05 23:50             ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-05 23:00               ` Alan Cox
2004-09-06  1:40               ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-07 22:58                 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-07 23:11                   ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08  3:39                     ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-08  4:12                       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08  4:16                       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-08  4:15                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-08  4:16                       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08  4:25                         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-08  6:01                           ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-08 13:02                             ` Alan Cox
2004-09-08 16:02                             ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-08 18:20                               ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08 18:32                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-08 18:54                                   ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08  6:55                           ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-08 11:11                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-08 11:38                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-08 18:21                             ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08 22:41                               ` Alan Cox
2004-09-09  0:31                                 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-09 13:06                                   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-08 15:03                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-06  0:06             ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-06  0:31               ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-06  1:38               ` Jon Smirl [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e47339104090518387bdf2d0a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox