From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: Ian Romanick <idr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Xserver development <xorg@freedesktop.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:28:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e47339104092810284f722e7f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <415997C6.1060802@us.ibm.com>
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:56:38 -0700, Ian Romanick <idr@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Anyone have a PCI card so that we can test actually using more than one
> at a time? In the mean time, I think just having them all load at once
> and one of them work is good enough.
It would be best if everyone tested each card individually right now,
both PCI and AGP versions should work.
I think I know of a couple places where it might break if multiple
cards are used simultaneously. All static variables in the core are
suspect and need to be individually checked. There are less than 20 so
it shouldn't take too long. Of course any help with this is
appreciated.
Another thing that isn't written is splitting the module parameters
between the core and personalities. I'll also switch syntax from 2.4
style to 2.6 style. When finished each module with have a debug=1
parameter and the core will also have a cards_limit which defaults to
16.
This version also includes minor number reuse so hotplugging a card
in/out won't exhaust the DRM minors.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-28 15:54 New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros! Jon Smirl
2004-09-28 16:56 ` Ian Romanick
2004-09-28 17:28 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2004-09-28 19:35 ` Helge Hafting
2004-09-28 23:10 ` Dave Airlie
2004-09-29 1:27 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 2:11 ` Dave Airlie
2004-09-29 5:25 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 11:59 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-29 13:16 ` Dave Airlie
2004-09-29 13:29 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 13:35 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 14:12 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 14:27 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 14:39 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 19:16 ` Keith Packard
2004-09-30 18:10 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 13:41 ` Dave Airlie
2004-10-01 5:15 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 14:25 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-30 0:00 ` Eric Anholt
2004-09-29 21:52 ` Felix Kühling
2004-09-29 21:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-29 23:25 ` Jon Smirl
[not found] ` <20041006133714.GA26860@localdomain>
[not found] ` <9e47339104100609307307f8ea@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20041006211922.GA5167@localdomain>
2004-10-06 21:46 ` Code status (Was: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!) Ian Romanick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e47339104092810284f722e7f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=idr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xorg@freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox