From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: current linus bk, error mounting root
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:47:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910503211647478c73bb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050322003807.GA10180@kroah.com>
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:38:08 -0800, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:19:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > (Adds lots of cc's. I trust that's OK).
> >
> > Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > No, I think Jens wants all of the distributions to fix it. I have
> > > filed a bug with Fedora on it.
> > >
> > > Something changed in the timing for loading drivers during boot. You
> > > used to be able to do:
> > > modprobe ata_piix
> > > mount /dev/sda1
>
> You can't do that on any udev based system reliably. That has _never_
> been true. You might just have been getting lucky in the past.
>
mkinitrd in Fedora needs to be modified to wait for the device.
Maybe something like a nash command like wait /dev/sda1.
> > > Now you have to do this:
> > > modprobe ata_piix
> > > sleep 1
> > > mount /dev/sda1
>
> That's still racy. Rely on the /etc/dev.d/ notifier to be able to tell
> you when you can mount your device, that is what it is there for.
>
> This is a udev issue, not a kernel issue, there's nothing we can do in
> the kernel about it (well, except for the obvious thing of giving udev
> lots of hints and making it easier for it to work properly and faster,
> which we have been doing over the past months.)
>
> > > I suspect the problem is that udev doesn't get a chance to run anymore.
> > > The sleep 1 allows it to run and it creates /dev/sda1.
> > > Build ata_piix in and the problem goes away too.
> > >
> > > Jens is right that this is a user space issue, but how many people are
> > > going to find this out the hard way when their root drives stop
> > > mounting. Since no one is complaining I have to assume that most
> > > kernel developers have their root device drivers built into the
> > > kernel. I was loading mine as a module since for a long time Redhat
> > > was not shipping kernels with SATA built in.
> >
> > I don't agree that this is a userspace issue. It's just not sane for a
> > driver to be in an unusable state for an arbitrary length of time after
> > modprobe returns.
>
> It is a userspace issue. If you have a static /dev there are no
> problems, right? If you use udev, you need to wait for the device node
> to show up, it will not be there right after modprobe returns.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-09 17:03 current linus bk, error mounting root Jon Smirl
2005-03-09 17:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-09 18:23 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-09 20:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-09 20:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-09 20:51 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-09 21:09 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-10 1:16 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-10 7:50 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-10 14:58 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-10 15:31 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-10 15:45 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-10 15:48 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-10 15:59 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-10 16:01 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-10 16:18 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-10 16:29 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-10 18:40 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-10 18:52 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-11 3:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-11 3:18 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-15 15:39 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-15 15:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-09 20:34 ` Steven Cole
[not found] ` <20050321154131.30616ed0.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <9e473391050321155735fc506d@mail.gmail.com>
2005-03-22 0:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 0:38 ` Greg KH
2005-03-22 0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-22 0:49 ` Greg KH
2005-03-22 0:57 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-22 4:02 ` Greg KH
2005-03-22 1:13 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-22 0:53 ` Jon Smirl
2005-03-22 4:03 ` Greg KH
2005-03-22 0:47 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2005-03-22 1:14 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-03-22 4:02 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-12 13:15 Alexander E. Patrakov
2005-03-12 19:56 ` Jon Smirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e4733910503211647478c73bb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox