From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261980AbVHFDsP (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 23:48:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262031AbVHFDsP (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 23:48:15 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:13231 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261980AbVHFDsO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2005 23:48:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ae02Sdk7PIJG/H2mDp2zOE+Rl1rPDfUd8uco6guNnOIjGgV5GzkbQqQRB7MtNHX9k+o8H7zHnksGOp6J6jwqfMPVhYOHZdcb5V811u3FswICM4E4XQLA8vQmxmH80QoQ1QMW7Q3HRpR3/36ubO9AGvJsGnsku3HbuQE+csrQg44= Message-ID: <9e473391050805204849fb2085@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 23:48:13 -0400 From: Jon Smirl To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Add the ability to unbind drivers to devices from userspace Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050806004205.GE5370@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050728040544.GA12476@kroah.com> <20050728054914.GA13904@kroah.com> <20050728070455.GF9985@gaz.sfgoth.com> <9e47339105072805545766f97d@mail.gmail.com> <20050728190352.GA29092@kroah.com> <9e47339105072812575e567531@mail.gmail.com> <20050728202214.GA9041@gaz.sfgoth.com> <9e473391050728132757a75d5f@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910507291150fe8f839@mail.gmail.com> <20050806004205.GE5370@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/5/05, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:50:44PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > Greg, is this ok for your tree now or does it need more work? > > It's in my queue, will add it to the tree next week. Sorry for the > delay, was at OSCON this week... Glad to see this. After it lands in the tree I'll fix up about ten places where I have attribute processing wrong because of this. Is there some place in the sysfs doc that this can be mentioned? Another thing that should be cleared up is if the attributes are described by length or zero termination. Right now they get both. I suspect the right answer here is supposed to be by length. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com