From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
To: jg@freedesktop.org,
Discuss issues related to the xorg tree
<xorg@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: State of Linux graphics
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:23:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e4733910508311123618b8851@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125510491.12626.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On 8/31/05, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org> wrote:
> Certainly replicating OpenGL 2.0's programmability through Render makes
> no sense at all to me (or most others, I believe/hope). If you want to
> use full use of the GPU, I'm happy to say you should be using OpenGL.
> - Jim
This is the core point of the article. Graphics hardware is rapidly
expanding on the high end in ways that are not addressed in the
existing X APIs.
The question is, what do we want to do about it? I've made my
proposal, I'd like to hear other people's constructive views on the
subject.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-31 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 16:03 State of Linux graphics Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 17:26 ` David Reveman
2005-08-30 18:13 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-30 22:38 ` Dave Airlie
2005-08-31 6:33 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 8:11 ` Anshuman Gholap
2005-08-31 17:20 ` David Reveman
2005-08-31 17:48 ` Jim Gettys
2005-08-31 18:23 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2005-08-31 19:06 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 19:14 ` Jim Gettys
2005-08-31 18:29 ` Keith Packard
2005-08-31 20:06 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 20:20 ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 1:04 ` James Cloos
2005-08-31 21:06 ` Keith Packard
2005-09-01 1:58 ` Allen Akin
2005-09-01 3:11 ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 6:00 ` Antonio Vargas
2005-09-01 10:20 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-01 13:57 ` Antonio Vargas
2005-09-01 6:11 ` Allen Akin
2005-09-01 3:59 ` Keith Packard
2005-09-01 15:24 ` Brian Paul
2005-09-01 15:59 ` Jim Gettys
2005-09-01 16:39 ` Andreas Hauser
2005-09-01 20:18 ` Jim Gettys
2005-09-01 20:38 ` Jon Smirl
2005-09-01 21:29 ` Sean
2005-09-01 16:09 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-01 16:04 ` Brian Paul
2005-09-01 17:21 ` Ian Romanick
2005-09-01 17:26 ` Keith Whitwell
2005-09-01 20:03 ` Allen Akin
2005-08-31 3:11 ` Daniel Stone
2005-08-31 4:29 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 4:50 ` Jon Smirl
[not found] ` <1125464500.8730.68.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2005-08-31 5:17 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 5:23 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 5:40 ` Jon Smirl
2005-08-31 6:15 ` Eric Anholt
2005-08-31 13:38 ` Jon Smirl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-02 2:44 rep stsb
2005-09-03 4:00 mcartoaje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e4733910508311123618b8851@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=jg@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xorg@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox