From: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@gmail.com>
To: Glenn Judd <gmj@meta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: gro: coalesce padded small IPv4 TCP segments
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:11:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e741e85-76ff-4625-85b0-62ee679aa2b0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731185431.2777685-1-gmj@meta.com>
Glenn Judd wrote:
> Software GRO fails to coalesce small IPv4/TCP segment that was
> padded up to the 60-byte minimum Ethernet frame.
>
> The selftest tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/gro.py subtest
> sw_ipv4_data_lrg_1byte sends {100, 1} expecting to receive {101}.
> In current code, it receives {100, 1} (no coalescing) instead.
>
> Cause: inet_gro_receive() computes its flush term from
> tot_len ^ skb_gro_len() before skb_gro_pull(), while skb_gro_len()
> still includes trailing Ethernet padding. A small IPv4/TCP segment
> padded up to the 60-byte minimum frame has tot_len != skb_gro_len(),
> so flush is set and the runt never coalesces.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6
> Assisted-by: Meta:internal-AI-tooling
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Judd <gmj@meta.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> RFC notes
> ---------
> Per Jakub Kicinski, the open question is fast-path cost: this adds two
> operations to the common IPv4 GRO path for every packet -- reading
> iph->tot_len and the skb_gro_len() comparison. Everything expensive
> (linear check, trim, pointer refresh, csum recompute) is behind unlikely()
> on the slow path. Is that per-packet cost worth the coalescing win for
> padded runts?
>
> Testing: netdevsim cannot reproduce this -- it never pads short frames to
> ETH_ZLEN -- so sw_ipv4_data_lrg_1byte passes trivially there. Reproduced
> and fixed on a real NIC (cx7): baseline FAIL -> patched PASS. Also
> validated locally under KASAN + CONFIG_FAIL_SKB_REALLOC (no UAF).
>
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> index 32d006c1a8ee..998ff77fd7b9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
> @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ struct sk_buff *inet_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> const struct net_offload *ops;
> struct sk_buff *pp = NULL;
> const struct iphdr *iph;
> + unsigned int tot_len;
> struct sk_buff *p;
> unsigned int hlen;
> unsigned int off;
> @@ -1498,6 +1499,25 @@ struct sk_buff *inet_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> goto out;
>
> NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->proto = proto;
> +
> + tot_len = ntohs(iph->tot_len);
> + if (unlikely(skb_gro_len(skb) > tot_len)) {
> + if (!skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> + if (tot_len < sizeof(*iph) ||
> + pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, off + tot_len))
> + goto out;
> +
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0 = skb->data;
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->frag0_len = skb->len;
> + iph = skb_gro_header(skb, hlen, off);
> + if (unlikely(!iph))
> + goto out;
> + if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE)
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->csum =
> + skb_checksum(skb, off, tot_len, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> flush = (u16)((ntohl(*(__be32 *)iph) ^ skb_gro_len(skb)) | (ntohl(*(__be32 *)&iph->id) & ~IP_DF));
>
> list_for_each_entry(p, head, list) {
>
> base-commit: 2fbade66245059c78daeaccfce13ecf499fffb51
To address Jakub's question on the fast-path cost: I benchmarked GRO
forwarding with two-minute long iperf sessions using 1, 2 and 4 TCP streams
(17 runs per configuration) and CPU frequency scaling disabled. I also
disabled RSS during the benchmarks because it caused a lot of noise - up to
20% variance in the deltas.
| streams | baseline (Gbit/s) | patched (Gbit/s) | delta |
|---------|--------------------|-------------------|--------|
| 1 | 14.083 ± 1.01 | 14.065 ± 0.67 | −0.13% |
| 2 | 13.891 ± 0.75 | 13.926 ± 0.78 | +0.25% |
| 4 | 13.008 ± 1.26 | 13.029 ± 0.97 | +0.16% |
The two added fast-path operations (iph->tot_len read + the skb_gro_len()
comparison on every IPv4 GRO packet) produce no measurable throughput
change. The deltas are all well under the 95% confidence interval and
indistinguishable from noise.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 18:54 [RFC PATCH net-next] net: gro: coalesce padded small IPv4 TCP segments Glenn Judd
2026-08-10 12:11 ` Richard Gobert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e741e85-76ff-4625-85b0-62ee679aa2b0@gmail.com \
--to=richardbgobert@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gmj@meta.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox