Re: Git pull ack emails..

Mark Brown
2018-10-23T09:45:43Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 831 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:35:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:10:47AM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So I feel that he automation model is just not good. The reply should
> > go to the actual pull request, not to the git history. People who want
> > just _that_ could already automate the git history thing without me
> > even doing anything at all, either scripting it themselves or by using
> > some filtering on the kernel commit mailing list..

> Can you tag merge commit with message-id of the pull request?
> Automation machinery can reply to the pull request with proper CC list
> obtained from the archive?

If you're doing that you could even just put all the info you'd get from
the e-mail like the CC list into the tag (or git note or whatever), no
need to bounce to a list archive.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]