From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: "Kernel Insider" (security optimization)
Date: 25 May 2001 04:59:47 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ekos3$v07$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0105250006440.1495-100000@Ono-Sendai.linux.hack>
>Its a linux kernel modification, that allows to decide wich uid, pid or
>file can open a tcp socket in listening state.
- Putting access control on listen() [rather than socket()/bind()]
seems like a really bad idea. In particular, in some cases one can
bind to a port and receive messages on it without ever calling listen(),
if I am not mistaken.
- The use of sock_i_uid(sock) seems poorly chosen; if sock->socket==NULL,
then your module will mistakenly think that the action was requested by
uid 0. In general, the return value from sock_i_uid() cannot be trusted
for permission checks for several reasons. Why don't you simply use
current->euid for your permission checks?
- Checking pid's doesn't seem like a good idea. If a process listed in
allowed_pids dies, then some other malicious process can wrap the pid
space and take over that trusted pid, thereby subverting your access
control policy.
- Are you aware of previous work on this subject? In particular, you
might enjoy checking out the Janus project, which is a much more general
implementation of this idea: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/janus/
- You should really join the mailing list hosted by Crispin Cowan working
to develop kernel hooks for this sort of kernel security modification.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-25 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-25 3:14 PATCH: "Kernel Insider" (security optimization) bruj0
2001-05-25 4:59 ` David Wagner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9ekos3$v07$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu' \
--to=daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox