The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Michal Simek" <michal.simek@amd.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: xilinx: Wait for link-up status during initialization
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:48:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f8a7c43-4862-45aa-951c-bf3e3c1f5513@topic.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610185734.GA819344@bhelgaas>


Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert


TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands

T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijmans@topic.nl
W: www.topic.nl

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
On 10-06-2025 20:57, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>> When the driver loads, the transceiver and endpoint may still be setting
>> up a link. Wait for that to complete before continuing. This fixes that
>> the PCIe core does not work when loading the PL bitstream from
>> userspace. Existing reference designs worked because the endpoint and
>> PL were initialized by a bootloader. If the endpoint power and/or reset
>> is supplied by the kernel, or if the PL is programmed from within the
>> kernel, the link won't be up yet and the driver just has to wait for
>> link training to finish.
>>
>> As the PCIe spec allows up to 100 ms time to establish a link, we'll
>> allow up to 200ms before giving up.
>> +static int xilinx_pci_wait_link_up(struct xilinx_pcie *pcie)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1 provides 100ms timeout. Since this is FPGA
>> +	 * fabric, we're more lenient and allow 200 ms for link training.
>> +	 */
>> +	return readl_poll_timeout(pcie->reg_base + XILINX_PCIE_REG_PSCR, val,
>> +			(val & XILINX_PCIE_REG_PSCR_LNKUP), 2 * USEC_PER_MSEC,
>> +			2 * PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS * USEC_PER_MSEC);
>> +}
> I don't think this is what PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS is for.  Sec 6.6.1
> requires 100ms *after* the link is up before sending config requests:
>
>    For cases where system software cannot determine that DRS is
>    supported by the attached device, or by the Downstream Port above
>    the attached device:
>
>      ◦ With a Downstream Port that does not support Link speeds greater
>        than 5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms following
>        exit from a Conventional Reset before sending a Configuration
>        Request to the device immediately below that Port.
>
>      ◦ With a Downstream Port that supports Link speeds greater than
>        5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link
>        training completes before sending a Configuration Request to the
>        device immediately below that Port. Software can determine when
>        Link training completes by polling the Data Link Layer Link
>        Active bit or by setting up an associated interrupt (see §
>        Section 6.7.3.3).  It is strongly recommended for software to
>        use this mechanism whenever the Downstream Port supports it.
>
Yeah, true, I misread the comment in pci.h. I cannot find any #define to match 
the "how long to wait for link training". Each driver appears to use its own 
timeout. So I should just create my own?


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-11  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1b153bce-a66a-45ee-a5c6-963ea6fb1c82.949ef384-8293-46b8-903f-40a477c056ae.69fac8ab-ab7f-45b5-992e-b4c97ec31d85@emailsignatures365.codetwo.com>
2025-06-10 14:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: xilinx: Wait for link-up status during initialization Mike Looijmans
2025-06-10 14:39   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: xilinx: Support reset GPIO for PERST# Mike Looijmans
2025-06-10 19:07     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-11  6:45       ` Mike Looijmans
2025-06-10 18:57   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: xilinx: Wait for link-up status during initialization Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-11  6:48     ` Mike Looijmans [this message]
2025-06-25 21:46       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-25 21:50         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-10 19:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-11  7:00     ` Mike Looijmans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f8a7c43-4862-45aa-951c-bf3e3c1f5513@topic.nl \
    --to=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox