public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, brett.creeley@amd.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com, horms@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/5] pds_core: remove extra name description
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:15:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f9688da-04b2-477f-a7fe-17c4e21cb8d1@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414173610.5dc3be9d@kernel.org>

On 4/14/2025 5:36 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:32:06 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> Fix the kernel-doc complaint
>> include/linux/pds/pds_adminq.h:481: warning: Excess struct member 'name' description in 'pds_core_lif_getattr_comp'
>>
>> Fixes: 45d76f492938 ("pds_core: set up device and adminq")
> 
> How is this a bug fix? The warnings are only generated on W=1 builds.
> Please be more considerate of folks maintaining stable trees. There's
> no need to waste their time with patches like this.

I'll drop it out and repost.

Thanks,
sln


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-11  0:32 [PATCH v2 net 0/5] pds_core: updates and fixes Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11  0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/5] pds_core: Prevent possible adminq overflow/stuck condition Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11 18:59   ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11  0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/5] pds_core: remove extra name description Shannon Nelson
2025-04-15  0:36   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-15 23:15     ` Nelson, Shannon [this message]
2025-04-11  0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 3/5] pds_core: handle unsupported PDS_CORE_CMD_FW_CONTROL result Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11 19:00   ` Simon Horman
2025-04-11  0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 4/5] pds_core: Remove unnecessary check in pds_client_adminq_cmd() Shannon Nelson
2025-04-11  0:32 ` [PATCH v2 net 5/5] pds_core: make wait_context part of q_info Shannon Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9f9688da-04b2-477f-a7fe-17c4e21cb8d1@amd.com \
    --to=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox