From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, yuyanghuang@google.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, clm@meta.com,
ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Check tail zero of bpf_prog_info
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 10:24:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fb5840e-fb05-4c9c-b6d6-73455a30e244@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4a64c5dffb0ebedc7460a21a52f2d94af931fda6c21d039bd71327a4cf79fce@mail.kernel.org>
On 3/6/26 23:37, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> Fix it by changing sizeof(info) to
>> offsetofend(struct bpf_prog_info, attach_btf_id).
>>
>> Fixes: b79c9fc9551b ("bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP")
>
> Is this the right commit for the Fixes: tag?
>
> The change avoids the trailing padding that exists because struct
> bpf_prog_info has 4 bytes of padding at its end, so sizeof(info) (232)
> differs from offsetofend(struct bpf_prog_info, attach_btf_id) (228).
>
> That trailing padding first appeared when __u32 verified_insns was
> appended after the last __u64 member (recursion_misses). Before that,
> the struct ended on an 8-byte-aligned member and had no trailing
> padding.
>
> b79c9fc9551b only appended two further __u32 fields (attach_btf_obj_id,
> attach_btf_id), while the 4-byte trailing padding already existed and
> was unchanged.
>
> Would this be more accurate?
>
> Fixes: aba64c7da983 ("bpf: Add verified_insns to bpf_prog_info and fdinfo")
>
>
Agreed.
Will update the Fixes tag in the next revision.
Thanks,
Leon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 14:45 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Check tail zero of bpf_map_info and bpf_prog_info Leon Hwang
2026-06-03 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Check tail zero of bpf_map_info Leon Hwang
2026-06-03 15:16 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-06-03 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Check tail zero of bpf_prog_info Leon Hwang
2026-06-03 15:17 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-06-03 15:37 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 2:24 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-03 14:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify checking padding bytes for bpf_[map,prog]_info Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fb5840e-fb05-4c9c-b6d6-73455a30e244@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=yuyanghuang@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox