From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info
Date: 10 Jul 2001 21:44:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9igljq$nlu$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B4BC5C0.BDDC12A6@home.com> <9igkjl$nk1$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <p05100358b771879535bc@[207.213.214.37]>
Followup to: <p05100358b771879535bc@[207.213.214.37]>
By author: Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@pobox.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> At 9:27 PM -0700 2001-07-10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > According to Dave J's utility the cpu's appear to be exactly the same
> >> just as the Intel boxes said when I bought them. What might be causing
> >> these values to be different. And if the BIOS is setting things up
> >> incorrectly then why does Dave J's utility show the correct values?
> >> Thanks for any help.
> >>
> >
> >/proc/cpuinfo shows "cooked" values which may be modified by the
> >kernel, depending on what it knows about CPU errata or kernel
> >capabilities.
>
> Max cpuid level doesn't get cooked by the kernel, though (at least
> not in 2.4.6).
>
> Level 3 is the Intel's CPU serial number "feature". Didn't Intel back
> off on that? Maybe that has something to do with it, and perhaps the
> utility is doing the cooking.
>
Actually, the kernel kills it if it detects it.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-11 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-11 3:19 Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info Jordan
2001-07-11 4:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 4:37 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 4:44 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2001-07-11 5:04 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 11:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 12:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 12:23 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Hugh Dickins
2001-07-11 14:28 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-11 16:47 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-11 17:00 ` Dave Jones
2001-07-12 6:58 ` [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86i Kai Henningsen
2001-10-10 1:38 ` [PATCH] Re: Discrepancies between /proc/cpuinfo and Dave J's x86info H. Peter Anvin
2001-07-11 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-11 15:51 ` Jordan Breeding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9igljq$nlu$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox