Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0.1 and 2.4.7-ac1

Robert Schiele
2001-07-27T08:35:26Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 995 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 08:55:52AM +0200, Niels Kristian Bech Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > - "static inline" means "we have to have this function, if you use it
> > but don't inline it, then make a static version of it in this
> > compilation unit"
> >
> > - "extern inline" means "I actually _have_ an extern for this function,
> > but if you want to inline it, here's the inline-version"
> >
> [SNIP]
> > ... we should just convert
> > all current users of "extern inline" to "static inline".
> >
> Doesn't work for the ones in include/linux/parport_pc.h, which have
> extern versions in drivers/parport/parport_pc.c. Gives build errors.

Is there any reason against just removing these functions from
drivers/parport/parport_pc.c? I do not see one. After all, they are
just duplicates.

Robert

--
Robert Schiele mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
Tel./Fax: +49-621-10059 http://webrum.uni-mannheim.de/math/rschiele/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 524 bytes --]