From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:33:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:32:51 -0400 Received: from abraham.CS.Berkeley.EDU ([128.32.37.121]:53766 "EHLO paip.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:32:49 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Newsgroups: isaac.lists.linux-kernel Subject: Re: Entropy from net devices - keyboard & IDE just as 'bad' [was Re: [PATCH] let Net Devices feed Entropy, updated (1/2)] Date: 21 Aug 2001 18:29:36 GMT Organization: University of California, Berkeley Distribution: isaac Message-ID: <9lu9ag$n5v$6@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <606175155.998387452@[169.254.45.213]> NNTP-Posting-Host: mozart.cs.berkeley.edu X-Trace: abraham.cs.berkeley.edu 998418576 23743 128.32.45.153 (21 Aug 2001 18:29:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2001 18:29:36 GMT X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test74 (May 26, 2000) Originator: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: >For clarity, I'm saying Robert's patch is GOOD, and those who are trying >to point out what I consider to be extremely theoretical weakness it >introduces into /dev/random (and then, only when config'd on), [...] That's one place where we disagree. Over-estimating entropy is not a theoretical weakness: this is something that real cryptographers get real worried about. It's one of the easiest ways for a crypto system to fail.