From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: macro conflict
Date: 24 Aug 2001 18:20:19 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9m65t3$410$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14764.998658214@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010824091538.32666A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>Looking through the code, min() is most always used to find some value
>that will not overflow some buffer, i.e.,
>
> len = min(user_request_len, sizeof(buffer));
>
>The problem is that sizeof() returns an unsigned int (size_t), and the
>user request length may be an integer. Everything works fine until
>you get to lengths with the high bit set. Then, you are in trouble.
>
>In this case, you could have a 'min()' that does:
>
>#define min(a,b) (unsigned long)(a) < (unsigned long)(b) ? (a) : (b)
>
>... where the comparison (only) is made unsigned, and you keep the
>original values. This should work, perhaps in all the current uses.
Just a small warning: If anyone writes something like
int len = min(user_request_len, sizeof(buffer));
if (user_request_len > len)
goto fail;
memcpy(dst, user_src, len);
they can get into trouble even with your min() macro.
Ok, maybe this is crazy code that noone in their right
mind would ever write.
This is not intended as a criticism -- your approach may be
sufficient for existing code -- but it is something to watch
out for.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-24 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-23 19:03 macro conflict J. Imlay
2001-08-23 19:21 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-23 19:34 ` Tim Walberg
2001-08-23 20:01 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-23 20:02 ` raybry
2001-08-23 20:16 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2001-08-23 20:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-23 20:29 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2001-08-23 23:18 ` Andrew Cannon
2001-08-23 23:37 ` Magnus Naeslund(f)
2001-08-23 23:35 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-24 1:42 ` Camiel Vanderhoeven
2001-08-24 13:03 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-24 13:15 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-24 13:17 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-24 14:20 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2001-08-24 21:17 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-24 13:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-08-24 18:20 ` David Wagner [this message]
2001-08-24 17:25 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-08-24 17:34 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-24 18:12 ` Bill Pringlemeir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9m65t3$410$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu' \
--to=daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox