From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How should we do a 64-bit jiffies?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:45:42 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9r43b6$1as$1@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1164.1003813848@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <3BD52454.218387D9@mvista.com>
In article <3BD52454.218387D9@mvista.com>,
george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>I am beginning to think that defining a u64 and casting, i.e.:
>
>#define jiffies (unsigned long volitial)jiffies_u64
>
>is the way to go.
..except for gcc being bad at even 64->32-bit casts like the above. It
will usually still load the full 64-bit value, and then only use the low
bits.
The efficient and sane way to do it is:
/*
* The 64-bit value is not volatile - you MUST NOT read it
* without holding the spinlock
*/
u64 jiffies_64;
/*
* Most people don't necessarily care about the full 64-bit
* value, so we can just get the "unstable" low bits without
* holding the lock. For historical reasons we also mark
* it volatile so that busy-waiting doesn't get optimized
* away in old drivers.
*/
#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || (BITS_PER_LONG > 32)
#define jiffies (((volatile unsigned long *)&jiffies_64)[0])
#else
#define jiffies (((volatile unsigned long *)&jiffies_64)[1])
#endif
which looks ugly, but the ugliness is confined to that one place, and
none of the users will ever have to care..
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-23 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-22 15:12 How should we do a 64-bit jiffies? george anzinger
2001-10-23 5:10 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23 6:05 ` Brian Gerst
2001-10-23 6:23 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23 8:03 ` george anzinger
2001-10-23 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2001-10-26 20:59 ` george anzinger
[not found] ` <200110231545.f9NFjgg01377@penguin.transmeta.com>
2002-05-10 21:35 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution george anzinger
2002-05-10 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-10 22:36 ` george anzinger
2002-05-10 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 0:42 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 george anzinger
2002-05-11 8:29 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 15:01 ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:10 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 17:31 ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 18:11 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 23:38 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12 0:01 ` Russell King
2002-05-12 0:31 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12 8:12 ` george anzinger
[not found] ` <3CDD6DA1.7B259EF1@mvista.com>
[not found] ` <20020511201748.G1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2002-05-12 8:03 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 (Fix ARM) george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:41 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-13 11:09 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9r43b6$1as$1@penguin.transmeta.com' \
--to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox