public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How should we do a 64-bit jiffies?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:45:42 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9r43b6$1as$1@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1164.1003813848@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <3BD52454.218387D9@mvista.com>

In article <3BD52454.218387D9@mvista.com>,
george anzinger  <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>I am beginning to think that defining a u64 and casting, i.e.:
>
>#define jiffies (unsigned long volitial)jiffies_u64
>
>is the way to go.

..except for gcc being bad at even 64->32-bit casts like the above.  It
will usually still load the full 64-bit value, and then only use the low
bits. 

The efficient and sane way to do it is:

	/*
	 * The 64-bit value is not volatile - you MUST NOT read it
	 * without holding the spinlock
	 */
	u64 jiffies_64;

	/*
	 * Most people don't necessarily care about the full 64-bit
	 * value, so we can just get the "unstable" low bits without
	 * holding the lock. For historical reasons we also mark
	 * it volatile so that busy-waiting doesn't get optimized
	 * away in old drivers.
	 */
	#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) || (BITS_PER_LONG > 32)
	#define jiffies (((volatile unsigned long *)&jiffies_64)[0])
	#else
	#define jiffies (((volatile unsigned long *)&jiffies_64)[1])
	#endif
	
which looks ugly, but the ugliness is confined to that one place, and
none of the users will ever have to care..

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-23 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-22 15:12 How should we do a 64-bit jiffies? george anzinger
2001-10-23  5:10 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23  6:05   ` Brian Gerst
2001-10-23  6:23     ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23  8:03   ` george anzinger
2001-10-23 15:45     ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2001-10-26 20:59       ` george anzinger
     [not found]     ` <200110231545.f9NFjgg01377@penguin.transmeta.com>
2002-05-10 21:35       ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution george anzinger
2002-05-10 21:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-10 22:36           ` george anzinger
2002-05-10 22:40             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11  0:42               ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 george anzinger
2002-05-11  8:29                 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 15:01                   ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:10                     ` Russell King
2002-05-11 17:31                       ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 17:37                         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 18:11                           ` Russell King
2002-05-11 23:38                             ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12  0:01                               ` Russell King
2002-05-12  0:31                                 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12  8:12                                   ` george anzinger
     [not found]                             ` <3CDD6DA1.7B259EF1@mvista.com>
     [not found]                               ` <20020511201748.G1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2002-05-12  8:03                                 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 (Fix ARM) george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:41                     ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-13 11:09             ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='9r43b6$1as$1@penguin.transmeta.com' \
    --to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox