From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <mailgate@hometree.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:39:27 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9rrjaf$iq5$1@forge.intermeta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011029021339.B23985@stud.ntnu.no> <3BDCD06E.8AF8FF69@pobox.com> <20011031090125.B10751@stud.ntnu.no> <15yzpC-26N6dEC@fwd04.sul.t-online.com>
Hasch@t-online.de (Juergen Hasch) writes:
>> I've now tried the Intel driver, no help, still get the NFS timeouts (the
>> intel driver doesn't output anything to dmesg, so it's no way of telling if
>> the same things occur as in the eepro100 stock-kernel driver).
>I had some trouble with an Intel STL 2 board and the onboard EEPRO100.
>Samba worked OK but it always got stuck on NFS transfers.
A datapoint that might be interesting:
I run four of these buggers with eepros as Internet-Interfaces for
heavy traffic (30-80 MBit sustained 24/7) under 2.2.19. Not a single
glitch on each of these boxes. The machines have two PIII/1GHz each
and a (custom built) SMP kernel based off RH 2.2.19-6.2.7
boot message:
eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html
eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.20.2.10 $ 2000/05/31 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and others
eepro100.c: VA Linux custom, Dragan Stancevic <visitor@valinux.com> 2000/11/15
eth0: Intel PCI EtherExpress Pro100 82557, 00:D0:B7:A8:67:EC, I/O at 0x2c00, IRQ 21.
Board assembly 000000-000, Physical connectors present: RJ45
Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
General self-test: passed.
Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
Internal registers self-test: passed.
ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
So there may be a change between 2.2 and 2.4 that triggers the problems.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de
D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-01 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-29 1:13 Intel EEPro 100 with kernel drivers Thomas Langås
2001-10-29 1:57 ` Jim Hull
2001-10-29 3:43 ` J Sloan
2001-10-31 8:01 ` Thomas Langås
2001-10-31 15:22 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-10-31 15:52 ` Kirill Ratkin
2001-11-01 7:55 ` Thomas Langås
2001-11-01 9:47 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-11-01 10:00 ` Thomas Langås
2001-10-31 18:10 ` Juergen Hasch
2001-11-01 8:03 ` Thomas Langås
2001-11-01 8:48 ` Juergen Hasch
2001-11-01 9:06 ` Thomas Langås
2001-11-01 9:43 ` Juergen Hasch
2001-11-01 11:11 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-11-01 12:00 ` Thomas Langås
2001-11-01 12:15 ` Juergen Hasch
2001-11-01 13:39 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen [this message]
2001-10-29 10:44 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-29 11:40 ` Michael Rozhavsky
2001-10-29 11:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-29 11:45 ` Michael Rozhavsky
2001-10-29 13:52 ` Thomas Langås
2001-10-30 8:36 ` Jarmo Järvenpää
2001-10-30 8:54 ` Dead2
2001-10-30 9:02 ` Jarmo Järvenpää
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9rrjaf$iq5$1@forge.intermeta.de' \
--to=mailgate@hometree.net \
--cc=hps@intermeta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox