From: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:10:46 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9rtnum$pvl$2@ncc1701.cistron.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111011224440.1053-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111020059170.5092-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de> <20011101182334.P16554@lynx.no>
In article <20011101182334.P16554@lynx.no>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com> wrote:
>Probably need to make idle a 64-bit value as well, even if the individual
>items are not, just to avoid potential overflow...
Well idle will still overflow after a bit more than 497 days on a
typical system that is 99% idle, if init_tasks[0]->times.tms_{u,s}time
are left at 32 bits.
Mike.
--
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former" -- Albert Einstein.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 22:11 [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime Petr Vandrovec
2001-10-31 21:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 22:58 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-01 0:23 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 0:52 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 11:21 ` george anzinger
2001-11-01 11:40 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 0:28 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 1:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-02 9:10 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg [this message]
2001-11-02 17:18 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 18:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-02 21:35 ` possibly incorrect comparisons of jiffies in linux kernel Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 16:35 ` [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime vda
2001-11-01 15:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 17:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-01 18:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 18:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-02 14:46 ` vda
2001-11-01 17:29 ` george anzinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-01 9:02 Petr Vandrovec
[not found] <01103121070200.01262@nemo>
2001-10-31 19:26 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 19:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:00 ` J Sloan
2001-10-31 20:20 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-31 20:33 ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-10-31 20:47 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 21:07 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:11 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 16:09 ` vda
2001-10-31 11:35 Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 15:39 ` vda
2001-10-31 14:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 18:16 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 18:35 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 18:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 18:58 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-31 19:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:11 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-31 20:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:05 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 21:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 7:45 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-31 19:06 ` george anzinger
2001-10-31 22:54 ` george anzinger
2001-11-04 18:31 ` Ton Hospel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9rtnum$pvl$2@ncc1701.cistron.net' \
--to=miquels@cistron-office.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox