From: linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be (Ton Hospel)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 18:31:33 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9s41i5$8dl$1@post.home.lunix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110311902410.29481-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de> <3BE08108.91067996@mvista.com>
Another way is to have jiffies still be a normal 32-bit counter, and have
another 32 bit value (high_jiffy) whose low bit is supposed to be equal to
the hight bit of the jiffy value. Set up a timer to repeatedly but rarely
check the high bit of jiffy and if it's different from the low bit of
high_jiffy, increase high_jiffy by one. In the rare cases you need to read
the full 64-bit (or rather, 63-bit) value, do the same test and combine the
two parts dropping one bit in the middle. (high_jiffy access would be locked)
This makes 63-bit read slow, but lets normal jiffy ops proceed at
normal speed. in fact, this method can be used to make any 32-bit counter
into a big counter without real speed loss if full length reads are rare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-04 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 11:35 [Patch] Re: Nasty suprise with uptime Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 15:39 ` vda
2001-10-31 14:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 18:16 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 18:35 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 18:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 18:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 18:58 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-31 19:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:11 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-31 20:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:05 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 21:39 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 7:45 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-31 19:06 ` george anzinger
2001-10-31 22:54 ` george anzinger
2001-11-04 18:31 ` Ton Hospel [this message]
[not found] <01103121070200.01262@nemo>
2001-10-31 19:26 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 19:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-31 20:00 ` J Sloan
2001-10-31 20:20 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-31 20:33 ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-10-31 20:47 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 21:07 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 21:11 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 16:09 ` vda
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-31 22:11 Petr Vandrovec
2001-10-31 21:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-31 22:58 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-10-31 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-01 0:23 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 0:52 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-01 11:21 ` george anzinger
2001-11-01 11:40 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 0:28 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 1:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-02 9:10 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-11-02 17:18 ` Tim Schmielau
2001-11-02 18:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-01 16:35 ` vda
2001-11-01 15:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 17:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-01 18:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-01 18:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-11-02 14:46 ` vda
2001-11-01 17:29 ` george anzinger
2001-11-01 9:02 Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='9s41i5$8dl$1@post.home.lunix' \
--to=linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox