public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be (Ton Hospel)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: File copy system call proposal
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:11:13 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9uu6mg$i68$1@post.home.lunix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1007782956.355.2.camel@quinn.rcn.nmt.edu> <1007833194.17577.0.camel@buffy> <1007839431.371.0.camel@quinn.rcn.nmt.edu>

In article <1007839431.371.0.camel@quinn.rcn.nmt.edu>,
	Quinn Harris <quinn@nmt.edu> writes:
> I wasn't aware of the sendfile system call.  But it apears that just
> like the mmap, write method suggested by H. Peter Anvin a memory copy is
> still performed when copying files from discs to duplicate the data for
> the buffer cache.  This would undoubtedly be faster than repeatedly
> calling read and write as it avoids one mem copy.  Yet GNU
> fileutils-4.1, that cp and install are part of, uses the read/write
> method.  I expect this is primarily because of portability issues but I
> wouldn't think the use of mmap would cause portability issues.

It does in fact. On some systems locks and mmaps are mutually exclusive.

  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-08 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-08  3:42 File copy system call proposal Quinn Harris
2001-12-08  4:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-12-08  6:03   ` Quinn Harris
2001-12-08 13:57     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-12-09  0:19       ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-12-09  4:56         ` Quinn Harris
2001-12-10  5:44       ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-12-09 20:25         ` Hans Reiser
2001-12-10 15:19         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-12-13 10:01           ` Andreas Dilger
2001-12-13 21:17             ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-19 20:26               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-12-20 10:09                 ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-20 13:38                   ` Svein Ove Aas
2001-12-20 13:53                     ` Jakob Østergaard
2001-12-20 14:00                       ` Jakob Østergaard
2001-12-23  1:19                       ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-20 14:31                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-12-20 15:06                       ` George Greer
2001-12-20 15:07                         ` David Woodhouse
2001-12-20 21:32                 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-12-08  4:25 ` Christian Lavoie
     [not found] ` <1007833194.17577.0.camel@buffy>
2001-12-08 19:23   ` Quinn Harris
2001-12-08 23:11     ` Ton Hospel [this message]
2001-12-09 15:35 ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-10 11:50   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-12-10  2:49     ` Hans Reiser
2001-12-10 12:13     ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-10 15:20   ` vda
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-10 18:44 Petr Vandrovec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='9uu6mg$i68$1@post.home.lunix' \
    --to=linux-kernel@ton.iguana.be \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox