* [PATCH] sched: Replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus()
@ 2011-03-26 12:52 Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-31 12:40 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation tip-bot for Sisir Koppaka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sisir Koppaka @ 2011-03-26 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel
The interval for checking scheduling domains if they are due to be
balanced currently depends on boot state NR_CPUS, which may not
accurately reflect the number of online CPUs at the time of check.
Signed-off-by: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3f7ec9e..c7ec5c8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/latencytop.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
/*
* Targeted preemption latency for CPU-bound tasks:
@@ -3850,8 +3851,8 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum
cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval);
if (unlikely(!interval))
interval = 1;
- if (interval > HZ*NR_CPUS/10)
- interval = HZ*NR_CPUS/10;
+ if (interval > HZ*num_online_cpus()/10)
+ interval = HZ*num_online_cpus()/10;
need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
--
1.7.0.4
Sisir
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation
2011-03-26 12:52 [PATCH] sched: Replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus() Sisir Koppaka
@ 2011-03-31 12:40 ` tip-bot for Sisir Koppaka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Sisir Koppaka @ 2011-03-31 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, tglx, mingo,
sisir.koppaka
Commit-ID: 3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1
Author: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:22:55 +0530
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:00:37 +0200
sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation
The interval for checking scheduling domains if they are due to be
balanced currently depends on boot state NR_CPUS, which may not
accurately reflect the number of online CPUs at the time of check.
Thus replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus().
(ed: Should only affect those who set NR_CPUS really high, such as 4096
or so :-)
Signed-off-by: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <AANLkTikqHWid2Q93F5U5Qw5snJH8C5PXoa7J6=6hYO94@mail.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3f7ec9e..c7ec5c8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/latencytop.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
/*
* Targeted preemption latency for CPU-bound tasks:
@@ -3850,8 +3851,8 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval);
if (unlikely(!interval))
interval = 1;
- if (interval > HZ*NR_CPUS/10)
- interval = HZ*NR_CPUS/10;
+ if (interval > HZ*num_online_cpus()/10)
+ interval = HZ*num_online_cpus()/10;
need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-31 12:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-26 12:52 [PATCH] sched: Replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus() Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-31 12:40 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation tip-bot for Sisir Koppaka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).