From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754060Ab0EUDfo (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:35:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:56051 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753659Ab0EUDfn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 23:35:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KYxNM7H4ZMPTgq3KWVl6VXZKOxCpNsHyKHA1xTlCQB7VFB6Sez2AZt8EZfQwUJMP15 vRfU1ChpazPa+0KTl1NV517S7WvrPp8gjtwTuyHdIcA2eDkoD4vFcOm/VyiP3bX8NCjU pUMhBpMW5fwouv4VyKCfkjdVIcE0kDy+Fh6zI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BF5BC48.6000809@euromail.se> References: <1274213429-22667-1-git-send-email-rydberg@euromail.se> <1274213429-22667-2-git-send-email-rydberg@euromail.se> <4BF4E00A.30206@euromail.se> <4BF5BC48.6000809@euromail.se> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 20:35:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: mt: Document the MT event slot protocol (rev2) From: Ping Cheng To: Henrik Rydberg Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Andrew Morton , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mika Kuoppala , Peter Hutterer , Benjamin Tissoires , Stephane Chatty , Rafi Rubin , Michael Poole Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote: >> I need double check with you although I think I know the answer. From >> your explanation and examples so far, I see MT_SLOT is only associated >> with one (x,y). Is this true?  If yes, can we eliminate the >> requirement for TRACKING_ID? If you think the requirement is >> necessary, can you give me an example where missing the TRACKING_ID >> would bring issue or confusion? > > Yes, each slot can only be associated with one (x, y) pair. No, we cannot > disregard the tracking id. A slot tracks a single contact for its entire > lifetime, during which the tracking id serves no purpose, but the slot cannot > tell us when the contact is replaced by a new one. This information is carried > by the tracking id. Ok, I've made enough noise in this thread. If we change SYN_MT_SLOT to ABS_MT_SLOT_ID (or something starting with ABS_ of your choice), I have no more questions. You can put my reviewed-by in the patch if that counts for anything: Reviewed-by: Ping Cheng Ping