From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754203Ab1ASMbJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:31:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:62492 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752613Ab1ASMbI (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:31:08 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mR0ONqRoa2rJjsUFtwawGKFXHQw9yr/aiFsSGaDo8hyuhbEOh0Y68OILhV4rhGyBOp OzZ1L+uJsn260qyD8efNBgAwtNnH2VyUMstpeCZpNVt36EqRJNQql6+lRqtY2kn2w+SB pGwjoLuewPDX4O+imZz/aCBjNlK6TnrC0F5XU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 04:31:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc1 doesn't boot From: "H.J. Lu" To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Shaohua Li , Matthias Klose Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Referring to the original posting from [1]: > > I am on latest linux-next (next-20110118) which has also [3] included, > x86_32 and using binutils-2.21 with PR ld/12327 fix from > Debian/experimental (see [2]). > > AFAICS the changes to my kernel-config... You are on x86_64 and have not set: > > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y > CONFIG_X86_NEED_RELOCS=y > > Ifdef *also* for CONFIG_RELOCATABLE for the parts in commit from [3] ? > > - Sedat - > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/19/52 > [2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~doko/binutils/pkg-2.21-debian/revision/85 > [3] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=86b1e8dd83cbb0 > Looks like the patch has been reverted. -- H.J.