From: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
To: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbohan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Set CGRP_RELEASABLE when adding to a cgroup
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:30:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin7B51maXHRH+FNmZ14bmWmEp9P2=2QTNqgq_Fi@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D42192C.9000701@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Tested-by: Mike Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org>
>
> I'm responding on Mike's behalf and adding him to this thread. This
> patch improves launch time of a test app from ~700ms to ~250ms on MSM,
> with much lower variance across tests. We also see UI latency
> improvements, but have not quantified the gains.
>
Is this attached to the wrong patch? I'd thought that it was the other
patch (removing the rcu_synchronize()) that's the performance booster.
This one is more about preserving the semantics of the notification
API.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 2:00 [PATCH] cgroup: Remove RCU from task->cgroups Colin Cross
2010-11-21 23:02 ` Colin Cross
2010-11-22 4:06 ` [PATCH] cgroup: Convert synchronize_rcu to call_rcu in cgroup_attach_task Colin Cross
2010-11-23 8:14 ` Li Zefan
2010-11-23 8:58 ` Colin Cross
2010-11-23 20:22 ` Colin Cross
2010-11-24 1:24 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-24 1:43 ` [PATCH] cgroup: Remove call to synchronize_rcu " Colin Cross
2010-11-24 2:29 ` Colin Cross
2011-01-22 1:17 ` Bryan Huntsman
2011-01-22 2:04 ` Colin Cross
2011-01-28 1:17 ` Bryan Huntsman
2010-11-24 2:06 ` [PATCH] cgroup: Convert synchronize_rcu to call_rcu " Li Zefan
2010-11-24 2:10 ` Colin Cross
2010-11-24 5:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] cgroup: Set CGRP_RELEASABLE when adding to a cgroup Colin Cross
2010-11-24 23:54 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-25 0:11 ` Colin Cross
2010-11-25 0:18 ` Colin Cross
2010-11-25 0:21 ` Paul Menage
2010-12-03 3:07 ` Colin Cross
2010-12-17 0:54 ` Paul Menage
2010-12-17 1:12 ` Colin Cross
2011-01-28 1:17 ` Bryan Huntsman
2011-01-28 1:30 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2011-01-28 1:48 ` Michael Bohan
2010-11-24 5:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: Remove call to synchronize_rcu in cgroup_attach_task Colin Cross
2011-01-28 1:17 ` Bryan Huntsman
2010-11-24 18:58 ` [PATCH] cgroup: Convert synchronize_rcu to call_rcu " Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTin7B51maXHRH+FNmZ14bmWmEp9P2=2QTNqgq_Fi@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mbohan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).