linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thilo-Alexander Ginkel <thilo@ginkel.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: Soft lockup during suspend since ~2.6.36 [bisected]
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:56:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=kQgS62c7HwwFGhNCQzWr2N6kZjA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 17:32, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday 04 April 2011, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
>> ACK. I see two possibilities:
>> a) The bug was introduced after the bisected bug was fixed
>> b) The bug was already present earlier, but was masked by the bug from
>> the bisected change
>>
>> I hope for a) as that would open the possibility to bisect this new bug.
>
> In case of b), you can still bisect it when you either apply the later fix
> or revert the original patch whenever you build a kernel. Or you can try
> to avoid using the usb-hid driver during bisect.

Thanks, that worked pretty well. A bisect with eleven builds later I
have now identified the following candidate commit, which may have
introduced the bug:

dcd989cb73ab0f7b722d64ab6516f101d9f43f88 is the first bad commit
commit dcd989cb73ab0f7b722d64ab6516f101d9f43f88
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue Jun 29 10:07:14 2010 +0200

    workqueue: implement several utility APIs

    Implement the following utility APIs.

     workqueue_set_max_active() : adjust max_active of a wq
     workqueue_congested()              : test whether a wq is contested
     work_cpu()                 : determine the last / current cpu of a work
     work_busy()                        : query whether a work is busy

    * Anton Blanchard fixed missing ret initialization in work_busy().

    Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
    Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>

:040000 040000 8b7443c650f0af36f1deba560586a91f6a88abcc
065589a95857a2fb73b94dc242c50ba558179a2a M      include
:040000 040000 84ca2de78af16483fa60a423f4f2d6eee0279eed
27487850f11a1e7ee9e4eaac54fd88f16d420d47 M      kernel

Brief summary for Tejun: Starting with this commit my system (x86_64,
4 CPUs) sporadically (probability around 25%) fails to suspend due to
a soft lockup. Full details at:
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/116
or:
  <BANLkTi=n4jLsjOYCd0L3hYb30sgPmdv_WA@mail.gmail.com>

I'd appreciate your help to resolve this issue and would be glad to
test any candidate patches.

Thanks,
Thilo

             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-05 18:56 Thilo-Alexander Ginkel [this message]
2011-04-05 23:28 ` Soft lockup during suspend since ~2.6.36 [bisected] Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-06  6:03   ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-14 12:24     ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-17 19:35       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-17 21:53         ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-26 13:11           ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 23:51             ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-28 10:30               ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 23:56                 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-29 16:00                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 16:18                     ` [PATCH] workqueue: fix deadlock in worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 20:40                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTi=kQgS62c7HwwFGhNCQzWr2N6kZjA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=thilo@ginkel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).