From: Thilo-Alexander Ginkel <thilo@ginkel.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: Soft lockup during suspend since ~2.6.36 [bisected]
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:56:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=kQgS62c7HwwFGhNCQzWr2N6kZjA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 17:32, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday 04 April 2011, Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
>> ACK. I see two possibilities:
>> a) The bug was introduced after the bisected bug was fixed
>> b) The bug was already present earlier, but was masked by the bug from
>> the bisected change
>>
>> I hope for a) as that would open the possibility to bisect this new bug.
>
> In case of b), you can still bisect it when you either apply the later fix
> or revert the original patch whenever you build a kernel. Or you can try
> to avoid using the usb-hid driver during bisect.
Thanks, that worked pretty well. A bisect with eleven builds later I
have now identified the following candidate commit, which may have
introduced the bug:
dcd989cb73ab0f7b722d64ab6516f101d9f43f88 is the first bad commit
commit dcd989cb73ab0f7b722d64ab6516f101d9f43f88
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Jun 29 10:07:14 2010 +0200
workqueue: implement several utility APIs
Implement the following utility APIs.
workqueue_set_max_active() : adjust max_active of a wq
workqueue_congested() : test whether a wq is contested
work_cpu() : determine the last / current cpu of a work
work_busy() : query whether a work is busy
* Anton Blanchard fixed missing ret initialization in work_busy().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
:040000 040000 8b7443c650f0af36f1deba560586a91f6a88abcc
065589a95857a2fb73b94dc242c50ba558179a2a M include
:040000 040000 84ca2de78af16483fa60a423f4f2d6eee0279eed
27487850f11a1e7ee9e4eaac54fd88f16d420d47 M kernel
Brief summary for Tejun: Starting with this commit my system (x86_64,
4 CPUs) sporadically (probability around 25%) fails to suspend due to
a soft lockup. Full details at:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/116
or:
<BANLkTi=n4jLsjOYCd0L3hYb30sgPmdv_WA@mail.gmail.com>
I'd appreciate your help to resolve this issue and would be glad to
test any candidate patches.
Thanks,
Thilo
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-05 18:56 Thilo-Alexander Ginkel [this message]
2011-04-05 23:28 ` Soft lockup during suspend since ~2.6.36 [bisected] Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-06 6:03 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-14 12:24 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-17 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-17 21:53 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-26 13:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-27 23:51 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-28 10:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-28 23:56 ` Thilo-Alexander Ginkel
2011-04-29 16:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 16:18 ` [PATCH] workqueue: fix deadlock in worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 20:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=kQgS62c7HwwFGhNCQzWr2N6kZjA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=thilo@ginkel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).