From: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:15:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikBqOitKTKHq_FKcqvxkypU1g+zAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302010100.2225.1333.camel@twins>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 20:03 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
>
> > @@ -1249,6 +1257,9 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struc
> > */
> > update_curr(cfs_rq);
> >
> > + /* check that entity's usage is still within quota (if enabled) */
> > + check_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Update share accounting for long-running entities.
> > */
>
> You already have a hook in update_curr() to account quota, why not also
> use that to trigger the reschedule? request_cfs_rq_quota() already has
> the information we failed to replenish the local quota.
>
> Then when you've gotten rid of check_cfs_rq_quota() there isn't a second
> user of within_bandwidth() and you can fold:
>
This actually what it looked like originally, but I broke it apart to
avoid a spurious need_resched coming from the put_path.
Looking again I realize we actually arbitrarily
clear_tsk_need_resched() on prev out of schedule() now so this isn't a
concern.
>
> > @@ -1230,6 +1233,9 @@ static void put_prev_entity(struct cfs_r
> > if (prev->on_rq)
> > update_curr(cfs_rq);
> >
> > + if (!within_bandwidth(cfs_rq))
> > + throttle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> > +
> > check_spread(cfs_rq, prev);
> > if (prev->on_rq) {
> > update_stats_wait_start(cfs_rq, prev);
>
> Into a single hook.
>
> > @@ -1447,10 +1544,15 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq
> > for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> > cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> > dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
> > -
> > + /* end evaluation on throttled cfs_rq */
> > + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) {
> > + se = NULL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > /* Don't dequeue parent if it has other entities besides us */
> > if (cfs_rq->load.weight)
> > break;
> > + check_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> > flags |= DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
> > }
>
> dequeue_entity() calls update_curr(), so again, by folding
> check_cfs_rq_quota() into your update_curr() hook this becomes simpler.
>
Yes I preferred it as a single hook out of update_curr, will put it
back that way :)
> > +static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> > +{
> > + struct task_group *tg;
> > + struct sched_entity *se;
> > +
> > + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + tg = cfs_rq->tg;
> > + se = tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
> > + if (!se)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_sched_entity(se) {
> > + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq_of(se)))
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> You can actually call for_each_sched_entity() with se==NULL, saves a few lines.
True enough, although this is subsequently subverted by throttle_count
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 3:03 [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V5 Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 01/15] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-03-24 12:38 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 02/15] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-03-23 10:39 ` torbenh
2011-03-23 20:49 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:31 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-04-08 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 6:57 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-04-04 23:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 03/15] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 20:44 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 20:47 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 04/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Paul Turner
2011-03-23 5:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-23 20:53 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:36 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-24 7:40 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 23:15 ` Paul Turner [this message]
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 05/15] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 06/15] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 07/15] sched: prevent interactions between throttled entities and load-balance Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 08/15] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 2:31 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 09/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 10/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 11/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 12/15] sched: maintain throttled rqs as a list Paul Turner
2011-04-22 2:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-04-24 21:23 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 13/15] sched: expire slack quota using generation counters Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 7:22 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-06 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 14/15] sched: return unused quota on voluntary sleep Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 2:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 15/15] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:38 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-24 16:12 ` [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V5 Bharata B Rao
2011-03-31 7:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-04-04 23:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 2:12 ` Test for CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-24 0:53 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-24 7:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-08 2:54 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-08 5:55 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTikBqOitKTKHq_FKcqvxkypU1g+zAw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pjt@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).