linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: readahead and oom
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:07:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim0MNgqeh1KTfvpVFuAvebKyQV8Hg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik8k9A8N8CPk+eXo9c_syxJFRyFCA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:49:25PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When memory pressure is high, readahead could cause oom killing.
>>> IMHO we should stop readaheading under such circumstances。If it's true
>>> how to fix it?
>>
>> Good question. Before OOM there will be readahead thrashings, which
>> can be addressed by this patch:
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/2/229
>
> Hi, I'm not clear about the patch, could be regard as below cases?
> 1) readahead alloc fail due to low memory such as other large allocation

For example vm balloon allocate lots of memory, then readahead could
fail immediately and then oom

> 2) readahead thrashing caused by itself
>
>>
>> However there seems no much interest on that feature.. I can separate
>> that out and resubmit it standalone if necessary.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fengguang
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> dave
>



-- 
Regards
dave

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-26  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-26  5:49 readahead and oom Dave Young
2011-04-26  5:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26  6:05   ` Dave Young
2011-04-26  6:07     ` Dave Young [this message]
2011-04-26  6:25       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26  6:29         ` Dave Young
2011-04-26  6:34           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26  6:50             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-26  7:41             ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-26  9:20               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26  9:28                 ` Minchan Kim
2011-04-26 10:18                   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-26 19:47                 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-28  4:19                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-28 13:36                   ` [RFC][PATCH] mm: cut down __GFP_NORETRY page allocation failures Wu Fengguang
2011-04-28 13:38                     ` [patch] vmstat: account " Wu Fengguang
2011-04-28 13:50                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-29  2:28                     ` [RFC][PATCH] mm: cut down __GFP_NORETRY " Wu Fengguang
2011-04-29  2:58                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-04-30 14:17                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-01 16:35                         ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-01 16:37                           ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-02 10:14                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-03  0:53                               ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-03  1:25                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:29                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-02 11:08                             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-03  0:49                             ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-03  3:51                               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-03  4:17                                 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-02 13:29                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-02 13:49                             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-03  0:27                               ` Satoru Moriya
2011-05-03  2:49                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04  1:56                     ` Dave Young
2011-05-04  2:32                       ` Dave Young
2011-05-04  2:56                         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04  4:23                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04  4:00                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04  7:33                         ` Dave Young
2011-04-26  6:13     ` readahead and oom Wu Fengguang
2011-04-26  6:23       ` Dave Young
2011-04-26  9:37 ` [PATCH] mm: readahead page allocations are OK to fail Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTim0MNgqeh1KTfvpVFuAvebKyQV8Hg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).