From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@osadl.org>
Subject: Re: merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 10:54:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim68rrUkRi0r-5xo4T10r5ALgcQhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105141827270.3078@ionos>
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011, John Kacur wrote:
>> I did some light testing merging 2.6.33.13 into real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31.
>> In addition I cherry-picked 3c955b407a084810f57260d61548cc92c14bc627
>> in order to compile on newer distros.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Here is the result of cyclic test on one machine
>> sudo ./cyclictest -t32 -p 80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000
>> policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/541 3759
>>
>> T: 0 ( 3728) P:80 I:10000 C: 10000 Min: 7 Act: 104 Avg: 114 Max: 470
>
> The numbers are weird. How does that compare to older kernels on that
> machine with the same test?
Note this was on a machine with a straight Fedora install, and no -rt
packages or tuning. That being the case, the numbers are no better or
worse than recent -rt kernels. I can get you numbers with the last
kernel if you wish, on Monday. Perhaps Carsten would be interested in
running his tests?
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-15 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-14 15:59 merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13 John Kacur
2011-05-14 16:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-15 8:54 ` John Kacur [this message]
2011-05-15 11:10 ` Carsten Emde
2011-05-18 7:52 ` John Kacur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTim68rrUkRi0r-5xo4T10r5ALgcQhg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=Carsten.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).