From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756020Ab1EOIyk (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2011 04:54:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:41194 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754838Ab1EOIyi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 May 2011 04:54:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=dlT74pTaG5f6S43dmyFIkf8rZnQeoF+gA8hLgHwPsLlt/DWIxlIeRUAlf/Vxz+ZBSO eszeZdTtQAl9qW3uQuOnh9UWnHkW/JlCreAWzGD66NxzjPr0ZGN/kdoRUfQCuJKM6YwU lSxWithZKuCmWT0aPMaM/fISe9nWDyL+rPKgE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 10:54:37 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: O0WAvLdhUNolNHvzvESKTFwUf5A Message-ID: Subject: Re: merge of real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31 with stable 2.6.33.13 From: John Kacur To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Carsten Emde Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2011, John Kacur wrote: >> I did some light testing merging 2.6.33.13 into real-time 2.6.33.9-rt31. >> In addition I cherry-picked 3c955b407a084810f57260d61548cc92c14bc627 >> in order to compile on newer distros. > > Thanks. > >> Here is the result of cyclic test on one machine >> sudo ./cyclictest -t32 -p 80 -n -i 10000 -l 10000 >> policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1/541 3759 >> >> T: 0 ( 3728) P:80 I:10000 C:  10000 Min:      7 Act:  104 Avg:  114 Max:     470 > > The numbers are weird. How does that compare to older kernels on that > machine with the same test? Note this was on a machine with a straight Fedora install, and no -rt packages or tuning. That being the case, the numbers are no better or worse than recent -rt kernels. I can get you numbers with the last kernel if you wish, on Monday. Perhaps Carsten would be interested in running his tests? John