From: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
To: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:25:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim7a9uhH_K6sw4YdqWB6frT+HUqqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110608163234.GA23031@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Kamalesh,
I'm unable to reproduce the results you describe. One possibility is
load-balancer interaction -- can you describe the topology of the
platform you are running this on?
On both a straight NUMA topology and a hyper-threaded platform I
observe a ~4% delta between the pinned and un-pinned cases.
Thanks -- results below,
- Paul
16 cores -- pinned:
Average CPU Idle percentage 4.77419%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 95.22581%
Bandwidth of Group 1 = 6.6300 i.e = 6.3100% of non-Idle CPU time 95.22581%
|...... subgroup 1/1 = 50.0400 i.e = 3.1500% of 6.3100%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 1/2 = 49.9500 i.e = 3.1500% of 6.3100%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 2 = 6.6300 i.e = 6.3100% of non-Idle CPU time 95.22581%
|...... subgroup 2/1 = 50.0300 i.e = 3.1500% of 6.3100%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 2/2 = 49.9600 i.e = 3.1500% of 6.3100%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 3 = 13.2000 i.e = 12.5600% of non-Idle CPU time 95.22581%
|...... subgroup 3/1 = 25.0200 i.e = 3.1400% of 12.5600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/2 = 24.9500 i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/3 = 25.0400 i.e = 3.1400% of 12.5600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/4 = 24.9700 i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 4 = 26.1500 i.e = 24.9000% of non-Idle CPU time 95.22581%
|...... subgroup 4/1 = 12.4700 i.e = 3.1000% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/2 = 12.5500 i.e = 3.1200% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/3 = 12.4600 i.e = 3.1000% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/4 = 12.5000 i.e = 3.1100% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/5 = 12.5400 i.e = 3.1200% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/6 = 12.4700 i.e = 3.1000% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/7 = 12.5200 i.e = 3.1100% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/8 = 12.4600 i.e = 3.1000% of 24.9000%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 5 = 47.3600 i.e = 45.0900% of non-Idle CPU time 95.22581%
|...... subgroup 5/1 = 49.9600 i.e = 22.5200% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/2 = 6.3600 i.e = 2.8600% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/3 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.8100% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/4 = 6.1900 i.e = 2.7900% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/5 = 6.2700 i.e = 2.8200% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/6 = 6.3400 i.e = 2.8500% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/7 = 6.1900 i.e = 2.7900% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/8 = 6.1500 i.e = 2.7700% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/9 = 6.2600 i.e = 2.8200% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/10 = 6.2800 i.e = 2.8300% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/11 = 6.2800 i.e = 2.8300% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/12 = 6.1400 i.e = 2.7600% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/13 = 6.0900 i.e = 2.7400% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/14 = 6.3000 i.e = 2.8400% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/15 = 6.1600 i.e = 2.7700% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/16 = 6.3400 i.e = 2.8500% of 45.0900%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
AMD 16 core -- pinned:
Average CPU Idle percentage 0%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 100%
Bandwidth of Group 1 = 6.2800 i.e = 6.2800% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 1/1 = 50.0000 i.e = 3.1400% of 6.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 1/2 = 49.9900 i.e = 3.1300% of 6.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 2 = 6.2800 i.e = 6.2800% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 2/1 = 50.0000 i.e = 3.1400% of 6.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 2/2 = 49.9900 i.e = 3.1300% of 6.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 3 = 12.5500 i.e = 12.5500% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 3/1 = 25.0100 i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/2 = 25.0000 i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/3 = 24.9900 i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/4 = 24.9700 i.e = 3.1300% of 12.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 4 = 25.0400 i.e = 25.0400% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 4/1 = 12.5000 i.e = 3.1300% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/2 = 12.5000 i.e = 3.1300% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/3 = 12.5000 i.e = 3.1300% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/4 = 12.5000 i.e = 3.1300% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/5 = 12.5000 i.e = 3.1300% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/6 = 12.4900 i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/7 = 12.4900 i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/8 = 12.4800 i.e = 3.1200% of 25.0400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 5 = 49.8200 i.e = 49.8200% of non-Idle CPU time 100%
|...... subgroup 5/1 = 49.9400 i.e = 24.8800% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/2 = 6.2700 i.e = 3.1200% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/3 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/4 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/5 = 6.2500 i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/6 = 6.2500 i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/7 = 6.2600 i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/8 = 6.2600 i.e = 3.1100% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/9 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/10 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/11 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/12 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/13 = 6.2200 i.e = 3.0900% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/14 = 6.2200 i.e = 3.0900% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/15 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/16 = 6.2400 i.e = 3.1000% of 49.8200%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
16 core hyper-threaded subset of 24 core machine (threads not pinned
individually):
Average CPU Idle percentage 35.0645%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 64.9355%
Bandwidth of Group 1 = 6.6000 i.e = 4.2800% of non-Idle CPU time 64.9355%
|...... subgroup 1/1 = 50.0600 i.e = 2.1400% of 4.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 1/2 = 49.9300 i.e = 2.1300% of 4.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 2 = 6.6000 i.e = 4.2800% of non-Idle CPU time 64.9355%
|...... subgroup 2/1 = 50.0100 i.e = 2.1400% of 4.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 2/2 = 49.9800 i.e = 2.1300% of 4.2800%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 3 = 13.1600 i.e = 8.5400% of non-Idle CPU time 64.9355%
|...... subgroup 3/1 = 25.0200 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/2 = 24.9900 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/3 = 24.9900 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/4 = 24.9900 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 4 = 25.9700 i.e = 16.8600% of non-Idle CPU time 64.9355%
|...... subgroup 4/1 = 12.5000 i.e = 2.1000% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/2 = 12.5100 i.e = 2.1000% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/3 = 12.6000 i.e = 2.1200% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/4 = 12.3800 i.e = 2.0800% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/5 = 12.4700 i.e = 2.1000% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/6 = 12.4900 i.e = 2.1000% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/7 = 12.5700 i.e = 2.1100% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/8 = 12.4400 i.e = 2.0900% of 16.8600%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 5 = 47.6500 i.e = 30.9400% of non-Idle CPU time 64.9355%
|...... subgroup 5/1 = 50.5400 i.e = 15.6300% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/2 = 6.0400 i.e = 1.8600% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/3 = 6.0600 i.e = 1.8700% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/4 = 6.4300 i.e = 1.9800% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/5 = 6.3100 i.e = 1.9500% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/6 = 6.0000 i.e = 1.8500% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/7 = 6.3100 i.e = 1.9500% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/8 = 5.9800 i.e = 1.8500% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/9 = 6.2900 i.e = 1.9400% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/10 = 6.3300 i.e = 1.9500% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/11 = 6.5200 i.e = 2.0100% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/12 = 6.0500 i.e = 1.8700% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/13 = 6.3500 i.e = 1.9600% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/14 = 6.3500 i.e = 1.9600% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/15 = 6.3400 i.e = 1.9600% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/16 = 6.4200 i.e = 1.9800% of 30.9400%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
16 core hyper-threaded subset of 24 core machine (threads individually):
Average CPU Idle percentage 31.7419%
Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 68.2581%
Bandwidth of Group 1 = 6.2700 i.e = 4.2700% of non-Idle CPU time 68.2581%
|...... subgroup 1/1 = 50.0100 i.e = 2.1300% of 4.2700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 1/2 = 49.9800 i.e = 2.1300% of 4.2700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 2 = 6.2700 i.e = 4.2700% of non-Idle CPU time 68.2581%
|...... subgroup 2/1 = 50.0100 i.e = 2.1300% of 4.2700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 2/2 = 49.9800 i.e = 2.1300% of 4.2700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 3 = 12.5300 i.e = 8.5500% of non-Idle CPU time 68.2581%
|...... subgroup 3/1 = 25.0100 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/2 = 25.0000 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/3 = 24.9900 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 3/4 = 24.9800 i.e = 2.1300% of 8.5500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 4 = 25.0200 i.e = 17.0700% of non-Idle CPU time 68.2581%
|...... subgroup 4/1 = 12.5100 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/2 = 12.5000 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/3 = 12.5000 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/4 = 12.5000 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/5 = 12.5000 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/6 = 12.4900 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/7 = 12.4900 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 4/8 = 12.4800 i.e = 2.1300% of 17.0700%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
Bandwidth of Group 5 = 49.8900 i.e = 34.0500% of non-Idle CPU time 68.2581%
|...... subgroup 5/1 = 49.9600 i.e = 17.0100% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/2 = 6.2600 i.e = 2.1300% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/3 = 6.2600 i.e = 2.1300% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/4 = 6.2500 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/5 = 6.2500 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/6 = 6.2500 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/7 = 6.2500 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/8 = 6.2500 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/9 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/10 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/11 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/12 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/13 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/14 = 6.2400 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/15 = 6.2300 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
|...... subgroup 5/16 = 6.2300 i.e = 2.1200% of 34.0500%
Groups non-Idle CPU time
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
<kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> [2011-06-08 14:46:06]:
>
>> On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 19:45 +0400, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > In our test environment, while testing the CFS Bandwidth V6 patch set
>> > on top of 55922c9d1b84. We observed that the CPU's idle time is seen
>> > between 30% to 40% while running CPU bound test, with the cgroups tasks
>> > not pinned to the CPU's. Whereas in the inverse case, where the cgroups
>> > tasks are pinned to the CPU's, the idle time seen is nearly zero.
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> > load_tasks()
>> > {
>> > for (( i=1; i<=5; i++ ))
>> > do
>> > jj=$(eval echo "\$NR_TASKS$i")
>> > shares="1024"
>> > if [ $PRO_SHARES -eq 1 ]
>> > then
>> > eval shares=$(echo "$jj * 1024" | bc)
>> > fi
>> > echo $hares > $MOUNT/$i/cpu.shares
>> ^^^^^
>> a fatal misprint? must be shares, I guess
>>
>> (Setting cpu.shares to "", i.e. to the minimal possible value, will
>> definitely confuse the load balancer)
>
> My bad. It was fatal typo, thanks for pointing it out. It made a big difference
> in the idle time reported. After correcting to $shares, now the CPU idle time
> reported is 20% to 22%. Which is 10% less from the previous reported number.
>
> (snip)
>
> There have been questions on how to interpret the results. Consider the
> following test run without pinning of the cgroups tasks
>
> Average CPU Idle percentage 20%
> Bandwidth shared with remaining non-Idle 80%
>
> Bandwidth of Group 1 = 7.9700% i.e = 6.3700% of non-Idle CPU time 80%
> |...... subgroup 1/1 = 50.0200 i.e = 3.1800% of 6.3700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 1/2 = 49.9700 i.e = 3.1800% of 6.3700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
>
> For example let consider the cgroup1 and sum_exec time is the 7 field
> captured from the /proc/sched_debug
>
> while1 27273 30665.912793 1988 120 30665.912793 30909.566767 0.021951 /1/2
> while1 27272 30511.105690 1995 120 30511.105690 30942.998099 0.017369 /1/1
> -----------------
>
> 61852.564866
> -----------------
> - The bandwidth for sub-cgroup1 of cgroup1 is calculated = (30909.566767 * 100) / 61852.564866
> = ~50%
>
> and sub-cgroup2 of cgroup1 is calculated = (30942.998099 * 100) / 61852.564866
> = ~50%
>
> In the similar way If we add up the sum_exec of all the groups its
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Group1 Group2 Group3 Group4 Group5 sum_exec
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 61852.564866 + 61686.604930 + 122840.294858 + 232576.303937 +296166.889155 = 775122.657746
>
> again taking the example of cgroup1
> Total percentage of bandwidth allocated to cgroup1 = (61852.564866 * 100) / 775122.657746
> = ~ 7.9% of total bandwidth of all the cgroups
>
>
> Calculating the non-idle time is done with
> Total (execution time * 100) / (no of cpus * 60000 ms) [script is run for a 60 seconds]
> i.e. = (775122.657746 * 100) / (16 * 60000)
> = ~80% of non-idle time
>
> Percentage of bandwidth allocated to cgroup1 of the non-idle is derived as
> = (cgroup bandwith percentage * non-idle time) / 100
> = for cgroup1 = (7.9700 * 80) / 100
> = 6.376% bandwidth allocated of non-Idle CPU time.
>
>
> Bandwidth of Group 2 = 7.9500% i.e = 6.3600% of non-Idle CPU time 80%
> |...... subgroup 2/1 = 49.9900 i.e = 3.1700% of 6.3600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 2/2 = 50.0000 i.e = 3.1800% of 6.3600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
>
>
> Bandwidth of Group 3 = 15.8400% i.e = 12.6700% of non-Idle CPU time 80%
> |...... subgroup 3/1 = 24.9900 i.e = 3.1600% of 12.6700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 3/2 = 24.9900 i.e = 3.1600% of 12.6700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 3/3 = 25.0600 i.e = 3.1700% of 12.6700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 3/4 = 24.9400 i.e = 3.1500% of 12.6700% Groups non-Idle CPU time
>
>
> Bandwidth of Group 4 = 30.0000% i.e = 24.0000% of non-Idle CPU time 80%
> |...... subgroup 4/1 = 13.1600 i.e = 3.1500% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/2 = 11.3800 i.e = 2.7300% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/3 = 13.1100 i.e = 3.1400% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/4 = 12.3100 i.e = 2.9500% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/5 = 12.8200 i.e = 3.0700% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/6 = 11.0600 i.e = 2.6500% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/7 = 13.0600 i.e = 3.1300% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 4/8 = 13.0600 i.e = 3.1300% of 24.0000% Groups non-Idle CPU time
>
>
> Bandwidth of Group 5 = 38.2000% i.e = 30.5600% of non-Idle CPU time 80%
> |...... subgroup 5/1 = 48.1000 i.e = 14.6900% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/2 = 6.7900 i.e = 2.0700% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/3 = 6.3700 i.e = 1.9400% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/4 = 5.1800 i.e = 1.5800% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/5 = 5.0400 i.e = 1.5400% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/6 = 10.1400 i.e = 3.0900% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/7 = 5.0700 i.e = 1.5400% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/8 = 6.3900 i.e = 1.9500% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/9 = 6.8800 i.e = 2.1000% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/10 = 6.4700 i.e = 1.9700% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/11 = 6.5600 i.e = 2.0000% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/12 = 4.6400 i.e = 1.4100% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/13 = 7.4900 i.e = 2.2800% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/14 = 5.8200 i.e = 1.7700% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/15 = 6.5500 i.e = 2.0000% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
> |...... subgroup 5/16 = 5.2700 i.e = 1.6100% of 30.5600% Groups non-Idle CPU time
>
> Thanks,
> Kamalesh.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 9:28 [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 01/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-10 8:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-11 7:55 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 8:13 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-11 8:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-11 8:59 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 02/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 03/15] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 04/15] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:20 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:37 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:32 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-17 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 7:16 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-18 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 05/15] sched: add a timer to handle CFS bandwidth refresh Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:21 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:27 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:56 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 06/15] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage and charge against bandwidth Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 12:59 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 7:02 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-16 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 07/15] sched: expire invalid runtime Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-16 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 08/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local runtime Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:23 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-16 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-16 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 09/15] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:24 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:24 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 10/15] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:24 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-17 13:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-18 7:18 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 11/15] sched: prevent interactions between throttled entities and load-balance Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:26 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:11 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 12/15] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:28 ` [patch 13/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 7:56 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:09 ` Paul Turner
2011-05-03 9:29 ` [patch 14/15] sched: return unused runtime on voluntary sleep Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-03 9:29 ` [patch 15/15] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-05-10 7:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-11 9:09 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-07 15:45 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-08 3:09 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-08 10:46 ` Vladimir Davydov
2011-06-08 16:32 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-09 3:25 ` Paul Turner [this message]
2011-06-10 18:17 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-14 0:00 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-15 5:37 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-06-21 19:48 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-24 15:05 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-07 11:00 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 14:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 15:20 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-07 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-08 15:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-09 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-09 13:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-12 10:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-12 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 4:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 5:03 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 5:05 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 11:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 16:21 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 17:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 17:54 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:35 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-15 17:55 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-15 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 17:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-20 0:38 ` Venki Pallipadi
2011-09-20 11:09 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-20 13:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 17:34 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-09-13 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 18:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-13 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-16 8:14 ` Paul Turner
2011-09-16 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 16:35 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-09-16 8:22 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-14 10:16 ` CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinned Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-14 6:58 ` [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Hu Tao
2011-06-14 7:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-14 7:44 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-15 8:37 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-16 0:57 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-16 9:45 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-17 1:22 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-17 6:05 ` Hu Tao
2011-06-17 6:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-17 9:13 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-06-18 0:28 ` Paul Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTim7a9uhH_K6sw4YdqWB6frT+HUqqQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pjt@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).