linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kconfig: autogenerated config_is_xxx macro
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:38:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinBkaaDOkx_oJZor5DXQyXh2=wWpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32557.1305572616@localhost>

Hi,

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:03 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:09:09 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD said:
>> On 10:52 Mon 09 May     , Michal Marek wrote:
>> > Do you have proof of concept patches that make use of the
>> > config_is_xxx macros? Acked by the respective subsystem maintainers?
>> > It would be a good idea to send them along to show that this feature
>> > is going to be actually used.
>> I've seen thousands of place in the kernel we can use
>> so I'll just take one example on x86
>>
>> the patch attached is just an example
>
> Out of curiosity, will this Do The Right Thing for cases where things simply won't
> build for some configs?  For example, consider this code snippet from kernel/timer.c,
> in __mod_timer() (near line 682):
>
>        debug_activate(timer, expires);
>
>        cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
>        if (!pinned && get_sysctl_timer_migration() && idle_cpu(cpu))
>                cpu = get_nohz_timer_target();
> #endif
>        new_base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
>
> If you convert this to an if statement, will it still compile?  Which will
> happen first, dead code elimination, or the warning that get_nohz_timer_target()
> is an implicit declaration because the definition in the .h file is also
> guarded by #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ?
>
I already exposed this case, but let's prove it:

% grep CONFIG_SMP .config
# CONFIG_SMP is not set

% git diff
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index fd61986..ea4a5ba 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -681,10 +681,8 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned
long expires,

        cpu = smp_processor_id();

-#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-       if (!pinned && get_sysctl_timer_migration() && idle_cpu(cpu))
+       if (0 && 0 && !pinned && get_sysctl_timer_migration() && idle_cpu(cpu))
                cpu = get_nohz_timer_target();
-#endif
        new_base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);

% gmake kernel/timer.o
  CHK     include/linux/version.h
  CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
  CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CC      kernel/timer.o
kernel/timer.c: In function '__mod_timer':
kernel/timer.c:685:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'get_nohz_timer_target'
gmake[1]: *** [kernel/timer.o] Error 1
gmake: *** [kernel/timer.o] Error 2

 - Arnaud

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-16 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06  5:03 [PATCH v2] kconfig: autogenerated config_is_xxx macro Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-06 16:19 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-07  1:50   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-09  8:52     ` Michal Marek
2011-05-13  8:09       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-13  8:30         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13  8:36           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-13 10:01             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 10:21               ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-05-13 10:38                 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-13 12:21                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-14 10:02                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-13 15:19         ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-16 19:03         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-16 19:38           ` Arnaud Lacombe [this message]
2011-05-16 20:05             ` Michal Marek
2011-05-16 20:24               ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-16 20:33                 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-17  1:08                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-17  1:03             ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-17 19:13               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-18  5:27                 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-05-13 16:26 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-13 18:18 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-17 14:45 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-17 18:19   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTinBkaaDOkx_oJZor5DXQyXh2=wWpg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lacombar@gmail.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).