From: "Drew DeVault" <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
<~sircmpwn/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: log path to loaded firmwares
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 12:55:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY6GDXDCFDBR.1R9QENSVRGR7L@homura> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191103175011.GA751209@kroah.com>
On Sun Nov 3, 2019 at 6:50 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> And it's totally noisy :(
>
> Please just make this a debug call, that way you can turn it on
> dynamically if you really want to see what firmware is attempting to be
> loaded.
The typical setup won't need more than say, 10-20 firmwares? On my
system I need 13, and 12 of them are just for AMDGPU. In the 20 minutes
since I rebooted to this kernel, it constitutes less than 1% of my dmesg
volume, and will only get less so over time unless I start hotplugging
stuff (in which case, their respective drivers are likely to make noise,
too). In practice, I don't think it'll be especially noisy.
On the other hand, enabling debug logs just to get this information
would generate heaps of noise for a little bit of signal. This use-case
isn't the exceptional case for me, on my systems I only install the
firmwares I need so this is something I would reach for every time I set
up a new system.
> Also, if you have a 'struct device' you should always use the dev_*()
> calls instead, which will show you exactly what device is asking for
> what.
Understood.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-03 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-03 17:38 [PATCH] firmware loader: log path to loaded firmwares Drew DeVault
2019-11-03 17:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-03 17:55 ` Drew DeVault [this message]
2019-11-03 18:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-03 18:06 ` Drew DeVault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY6GDXDCFDBR.1R9QENSVRGR7L@homura \
--to=sir@cmpwn.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=~sircmpwn/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox