From: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: NFS: set_bit on an 'int' variable OK for 64-bit?
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:51:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C12569B2.005C9182.00@d12mta01.de.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello,
since test11, the NFS code uses the set_bit and related routines
to manipulate the wb_flags member of the nfs_page struct (nfs_page.h).
Unfortunately, wb_flags has still data type 'int'.
This is a problem (at least) on the 64-bit S/390 architecture,
as our ..._bit macros assume bit 0 is the least significant bit
of a 'long', which means due to big-endian byte order that bit 0
resides in the 7th byte of the variable. As an int occupies only
4 bytes, however, set_bit(0, int) clobbers memory.
Now the question is, who's correct?
At all other places (I found, at least), the ..._bit macros
are indeed used only on 'long' variables (or arrays).
However, on the Alpha, the ..._bit routines assume bit 0 to
be the least significant bit of an 'int'. Sparc64 on the other
hand also uses 'long' :-/
What do you suggest we should do? Fix nfs_page to use a 'long'
variable, or change our bitops macros to use ints?
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
Linux for S/390 Design & Development
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 --- Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-11 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-11 16:51 Ulrich.Weigand [this message]
2000-12-11 17:01 ` NFS: set_bit on an 'int' variable OK for 64-bit? Jes Sorensen
2000-12-11 17:08 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-15 5:47 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C12569B2.005C9182.00@d12mta01.de.ibm.com \
--to=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox