From: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"fabian@ritter-vogt.de Vogt" <fabian@ritter-vogt.de>,
Lionel Debroux <lionel_debroux@yahoo.fr>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 arm: initial TI-Nspire support]
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:42:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C576ECFF-EF90-4995-AD28-1CEEE660DBAB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304111430.05528.arnd@arndb.de>
On 11/04/2013, at 10:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 April 2013, Daniel Tang wrote:
>> This is another updated patch for Linux on TI-Nspire support.
>>
>> Apologies for previously posting updated patches as replies to the first thread. I'll send updated patches in new threads from now to avoid confusion.
>>
>> Changes between http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20130408.113343.585af217.en.html and v2:
>> * Added new drivers to support the irqchip and timers on older models.
>> * Added new device trees to support the other models.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@gmail.com>
>
> Nice!
>
>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +
>> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 16 ++
>> arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire-classic.dtsi | 68 ++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire-clp.dts | 45 ++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire-cx.dts | 115 ++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire-tp.dts | 44 ++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/nspire.dtsi | 159 ++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/include/debug/nspire.S | 28 +++
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/Kconfig | 15 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/Makefile | 2 +
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/Makefile.boot | 0
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/clcd.c | 118 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/clcd.h | 14 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/mmio.h | 15 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-nspire/nspire.c | 142 +++++++++++++
>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clocksource/nspire-classic-timer.c | 216 +++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/input/keyboard/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/input/keyboard/nspire-keypad.c | 316 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-nspire-classic.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++
>> include/clocksource/nspire_classic_timer.h | 16 ++
>> include/linux/platform_data/nspire-keypad.h | 28 +++
>> 26 files changed, 1553 insertions(+)
>
> Please split this up into a series of patches, one for each subsystem.
> I would also keep the dts files in a separate patch from the platform
> code.
Fair enough. I'll keep that in mind for the next round of patches.
>
>
>> +bool timer_init;
>> +
>> +void __init nspire_classic_timer_init(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node;
>> +
>> + if (timer_init)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, DT_COMPAT) {
>> + nspire_timer_add(node);
>> + }
>> +
>> + timer_init = 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(nspire_classic_timer,
>> + DT_COMPAT, nspire_classic_timer_init)
>
> Why do you need the logic to prevent it from being initilized
> twice? Can't you just remove the direct call to nspire_classic_timer_init
> from platform code and rely on of_clk_init() to call it?
>
Ah, I wasn't aware that of_clk_init() would call the init functions. I thought it was up to clocksource_of_init() to do that.
Originally, I was adding a call to clocksource_of_init() to the platform code but that resulted in the timers being added twice. If of_clk_init() already calls the init functions, that would explain it.
> Note that the interface has changed in linux-next, you now
> get called separately for each matching device, with the device_node
> as the argument, so you no longer have to search the device tree,
> and can essentially do
>
> CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(nspire_classic_timer, DT_COMPAT, nspire_timer_add);
>
> Feel free to rebase your patch on top of the clksrc/cleanup branch
> in arm-soc to get the new behavior.
That's perfect. That'll also let me kick the whole timer_init boolean thing.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/nspire-keypad.h b/include/linux/platform_data/nspire-keypad.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..03deb64
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/nspire-keypad.h
>
> And this file now also isn't needed any more, you can just merge the
> fields of struct nspire_keypad_data into struct nspire_keypad.
>
> Arnd
Thanks again,
tangrs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 11:51 [RFC PATCHv2 arm: initial TI-Nspire support] Daniel Tang
2013-04-11 12:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-11 12:42 ` Daniel Tang [this message]
2013-04-11 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-19 12:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C576ECFF-EF90-4995-AD28-1CEEE660DBAB@gmail.com \
--to=dt.tangr@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fabian@ritter-vogt.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lionel_debroux@yahoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox