From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752841Ab3IVX1y (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:27:54 -0400 Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:62328 "EHLO mail-ve0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752219Ab3IVX1x (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 19:27:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130922231214.GF31014@kernel.dk> References: <20130922215520.GE31014@kernel.dk> <20130922231214.GF31014@kernel.dk> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:27:52 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fvnw8f39R5Dt3id0kx3PAtpVnUw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block IO fixes for 3.12 From: Linus Torvalds To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tejun Heo , Mike Christie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Not necessarily bad quality control, but yeah, the commit messages > could've been prettier. Those two should have been git ammended, most of > them are directly applied byt git am fwiw. No, one of them was clearly *not* done with git am, because git am uses the subject like to create that summary message. And the other one you should have edited the mbox before feeding it to git am - or pushed back on the submitter to write email in a format where no such editing is necessary. "I used git am" is not an excuse for bad formatting of commits. It's just a tool, you need to make sure the tool is fed valid data. Linus