From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
pv-drivers@vmware.com, Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@vmware.com>,
stable@kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/log2.h: Fix rounddown_pow_of_two(1)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:50:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyCaZ89wWEjFyiwJmGxfmTiR0ri7zjp0V=KeyvMo75etw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323712953-13636-1-git-send-email-dtor@vmware.com>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com> wrote:
> From: Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@vmware.com>
>
> 1 is a power of two, therefore rounddown_pow_of_two(1) should return 1.
> It does in case the argument is a variable but in case it's a constant
> it behaves incorrectly and returns 0. Probably nobody ever did it so
> this was never noticed, however drivers/net/vmxnet3 with latest GCC does
> and breaks on unicpu systems.
>
> This is similar to Rolf's patch to roundup_pow_of_two(1).
Umm. I already applied this patch, but then I started looking at it
more, and asked myself:
- Why is that "n == 1" test there AT ALL?
Afaik, that whole test is just plain stupid. It seems to have been
copied from the "roundup()" case (where it exists due to the "-1/+1"
hackery that breaks ilog2()) without any thought about the actual math
of the function at all.
I think the *real* fix is to just remove that incorrect line, no?
It's a bit sad that we apparently have several reviewers for this
trivial patch, and nobody reacted to the math just not making any
sense.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-12 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-12 18:02 [PATCH] include/log2.h: Fix rounddown_pow_of_two(1) Dmitry Torokhov
2011-12-12 23:50 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2011-12-13 6:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-12-13 20:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 20:06 ` [Pv-drivers] " Bhavesh Davda
2011-12-13 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-16 19:56 Andrei Warkentin
2011-11-16 22:51 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2011-11-17 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-18 18:46 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-11-19 9:26 ` Marco Stornelli
2011-11-22 23:34 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-11-08 19:08 Andrei Warkentin
2011-11-08 19:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-11-14 21:17 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-11-14 23:27 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFyCaZ89wWEjFyiwJmGxfmTiR0ri7zjp0V=KeyvMo75etw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreiw@vmware.com \
--cc=dtor@vmware.com \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).