linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 13:18:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzRAn=7km3xNn2BKjsLAc=SOma584tYnzD+nanab8H_Hw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180225150505.GD7144@yexl-desktop>

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:05 AM, kernel test robot
<xiaolong.ye@intel.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed a -18.0% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
>
> commit: c0cef30e4ff0dc025f4a1660b8f0ba43ed58426e ("iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64")

That looks very unlikely.  Can you double-check that? Because it
shouldn't even change anything apart from trivial compiler instruction
selection.

             Linus

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-25 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-25 15:05 [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression kernel test robot
2018-02-25 15:41 ` Jeff Layton
2018-02-26  8:38   ` Ye Xiaolong
2018-02-26 11:43     ` Jeff Layton
2018-02-26 12:33       ` Jeff Layton
2018-02-27  7:42         ` [LKP] " kemi
2018-02-27 13:29           ` Jeff Layton
2018-02-27 13:43           ` David Howells
2018-02-27 15:27             ` Jeff Layton
2018-02-27 17:04             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-03-02  5:54               ` kemi
2018-03-15  7:33   ` kemi
2018-03-15 17:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-25 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFzRAn=7km3xNn2BKjsLAc=SOma584tYnzD+nanab8H_Hw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).