From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755258AbbITSWn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:22:43 -0400
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:37986 "EHLO
	mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754328AbbITSWm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:22:42 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1442743911-25366-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
References: <1442743911-25366-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
	<1442743911-25366-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:22:41 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ycEA0AZgDOQy3LFBMmIklsxppTM
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzxoz-WW8tzYCBezU9gvHNY7yNeC-o2ReRmD7XKNw2O+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] locking/mutex: Relax to atomic/release semantics
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote:
> ... by using acquire semantics where appropriate As such, weakly
> ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use of barriers when
> issuing atomics.

Subject line is wrong. I'm assuming it should be acquire/release
rather than atomic/release.

                    Linus