* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-12-17 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-17 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-12-17 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 12/17/24 09:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.232 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.232-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-17 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-12-17 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2024-12-18 9:17 ` Dominique Martinet
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-12-17 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.232 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-12-17 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-12-17 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-12-18 9:17 ` Dominique Martinet
2024-12-18 12:38 ` Mark Brown
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2024-12-18 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:06:51PM +0100:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.232 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.232-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested 238644b47ee3 ("Linux 5.10.232-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 9:17 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2024-12-18 12:38 ` Mark Brown
2024-12-18 17:20 ` Jon Hunter
2024-12-18 17:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2024-12-18 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 346 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:06:51PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.232 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 12:38 ` Mark Brown
@ 2024-12-18 17:20 ` Jon Hunter
2024-12-18 17:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-12-18 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:06:51 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.232 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.232-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
67 tests: 67 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.232-rc1-g238644b47ee3
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review
2024-12-17 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.232-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-18 17:20 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-12-18 17:55 ` Naresh Kamboju
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-12-18 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 22:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.232 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.232-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The all i386 builds failed with the gcc-12 and clang-19
toolchain builds on following branches,
- linux-6.12.y
- linux-6.6.y
- linux-6.1.y
- linux-5.15.y
- linux-5.10.y
* i386, build
- clang-19-defconfig
- gcc-13-defconfig
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Build log:
-------------
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: static_call_initialized
>>> referenced by static_call.c
>>> kernel/static_call.o:(__static_call_update_early) in archive arch/x86/built-in.a
The recent commit on this file is,
x86/static-call: provide a way to do very early static-call updates
commit 0ef8047b737d7480a5d4c46d956e97c190f13050 upstream.
js wrote:
Yes, the fix is at (via one hop):
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/aec47f97-c59b-403a-bf2a-d8551e2ec6f9@suse.com/
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.232-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 238644b47ee3440015a824c17a271f482d551c13
* git describe: v5.10.231-44-g238644b47ee3
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.231-44-g238644b47ee3
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.230-460-g2146a7485c27)
* i386, build
- clang-19-allnoconfig
- clang-19-defconfig
- clang-19-lkftconfig
- clang-19-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
- clang-19-tinyconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
- gcc-12-allnoconfig
- gcc-12-defconfig
- gcc-12-lkftconfig
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf
- gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture
- gcc-12-tinyconfig
- gcc-8-allnoconfig
- gcc-8-i386_defconfig
- gcc-8-tinyconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.230-460-g2146a7485c27)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.230-460-g2146a7485c27)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.230-460-g2146a7485c27)
## Test result summary
total: 34331, pass: 23179, fail: 2919, skip: 8221, xfail: 12
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 101 total, 101 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 28 total, 28 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 22 total, 0 passed, 22 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread