linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails
@ 2025-07-15  9:18 Rick Wertenbroek
  2025-07-15  9:25 ` Rick Wertenbroek
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rick Wertenbroek @ 2025-07-15  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: rick.wertenbroek, dlemoal, alberto.dassatti, Rick Wertenbroek,
	Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, Chaitanya Kulkarni, linux-nvme,
	linux-kernel

Have nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete failed commands.

Description of the problem:
nvmet_req_init() calls __nvmet_req_complete() internally upon failure,
e.g., unsupported opcode, which calls the "queue_response" callback,
this results in nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() being called, which will
call nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() if data_len is 0 or if dma_dir is
different than DMA_TO_DEVICE. This results in a double completion as
nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() also calls nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod()
when nvmet_req_init() fails.

Steps to reproduce:
On the host send a command with an unsupported opcode with nvme-cli,
For example the admin command "security receive"
$ sudo nvme security-recv /dev/nvme0n1 -n1 -x4096

This triggers a double completion as nvmet_req_init() fails and
nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() is called, here iod->dma_dir is still
in the default state of "DMA_NONE" as set by default in
nvmet_pci_epf_alloc_iod(), so nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is called.
Because nvmet_req_init() failed nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is also
called in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() leading to a doubple completion.

This patch lets nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete all failed
commands, and removes the double completion case in
nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() therefore fixing the edge cases where
double completions occurred.

Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
index a4295a5b8d28..aad828eb72d6 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response(struct nvmet_req *req)
 	iod->status = le16_to_cpu(req->cqe->status) >> 1;
 
 	/* If we have no data to transfer, directly complete the command. */
-	if (!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
+	if (iod->status || !iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
 		nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod(iod);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1604,8 +1604,13 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		goto complete;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If nvmet_req_init() fails (e.g., unsupported opcode) it will call
+	 * __nvmet_req_complete() internally which will call
+	 * nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() and will complete the command directly.
+	 */
 	if (!nvmet_req_init(req, &iod->sq->nvme_sq, &nvmet_pci_epf_fabrics_ops))
-		goto complete;
+		return;
 
 	iod->data_len = nvmet_req_transfer_len(req);
 	if (iod->data_len) {
@@ -1643,10 +1648,11 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	wait_for_completion(&iod->done);
 
-	if (iod->status == NVME_SC_SUCCESS) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE);
-		nvmet_pci_epf_transfer_iod_data(iod);
-	}
+	if (iod->status != NVME_SC_SUCCESS)
+		return;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+	nvmet_pci_epf_transfer_iod_data(iod);
 
 complete:
 	nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod(iod);
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails
  2025-07-15  9:18 [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails Rick Wertenbroek
@ 2025-07-15  9:25 ` Rick Wertenbroek
  2025-07-15 23:14 ` Damien Le Moal
  2025-07-15 23:22 ` Damien Le Moal
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rick Wertenbroek @ 2025-07-15  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: rick.wertenbroek, dlemoal, alberto.dassatti, Christoph Hellwig,
	Sagi Grimberg, Chaitanya Kulkarni, linux-nvme, linux-kernel

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:18 AM Rick Wertenbroek
<rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Have nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete failed commands.
>
> Description of the problem:
> nvmet_req_init() calls __nvmet_req_complete() internally upon failure,
> e.g., unsupported opcode, which calls the "queue_response" callback,
> this results in nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() being called, which will
> call nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() if data_len is 0 or if dma_dir is
> different than DMA_TO_DEVICE. This results in a double completion as
> nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() also calls nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod()
> when nvmet_req_init() fails.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> On the host send a command with an unsupported opcode with nvme-cli,
> For example the admin command "security receive"
> $ sudo nvme security-recv /dev/nvme0n1 -n1 -x4096
>
> This triggers a double completion as nvmet_req_init() fails and
> nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() is called, here iod->dma_dir is still
> in the default state of "DMA_NONE" as set by default in
> nvmet_pci_epf_alloc_iod(), so nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is called.
> Because nvmet_req_init() failed nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is also
> called in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() leading to a doubple completion.
>

s/doubple/double/

> This patch lets nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete all failed
> commands, and removes the double completion case in
> nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() therefore fixing the edge cases where
> double completions occurred.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> index a4295a5b8d28..aad828eb72d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> @@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response(struct nvmet_req *req)
>         iod->status = le16_to_cpu(req->cqe->status) >> 1;
>
>         /* If we have no data to transfer, directly complete the command. */
> -       if (!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> +       if (iod->status || !iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
>                 nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod(iod);
>                 return;
>         }
> @@ -1604,8 +1604,13 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work(struct work_struct *work)
>                 goto complete;
>         }
>
> +       /*
> +        * If nvmet_req_init() fails (e.g., unsupported opcode) it will call
> +        * __nvmet_req_complete() internally which will call
> +        * nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() and will complete the command directly.
> +        */
>         if (!nvmet_req_init(req, &iod->sq->nvme_sq, &nvmet_pci_epf_fabrics_ops))
> -               goto complete;
> +               return;
>
>         iod->data_len = nvmet_req_transfer_len(req);
>         if (iod->data_len) {
> @@ -1643,10 +1648,11 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
>         wait_for_completion(&iod->done);
>
> -       if (iod->status == NVME_SC_SUCCESS) {
> -               WARN_ON_ONCE(!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> -               nvmet_pci_epf_transfer_iod_data(iod);
> -       }
> +       if (iod->status != NVME_SC_SUCCESS)
> +               return;
> +
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +       nvmet_pci_epf_transfer_iod_data(iod);
>
>  complete:
>         nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod(iod);
> --
> 2.25.1
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails
  2025-07-15  9:18 [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails Rick Wertenbroek
  2025-07-15  9:25 ` Rick Wertenbroek
@ 2025-07-15 23:14 ` Damien Le Moal
  2025-07-15 23:22 ` Damien Le Moal
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-07-15 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rick Wertenbroek
  Cc: rick.wertenbroek, alberto.dassatti, Christoph Hellwig,
	Sagi Grimberg, Chaitanya Kulkarni, linux-nvme, linux-kernel

On 7/15/25 18:18, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> Have nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete failed commands.
> 
> Description of the problem:
> nvmet_req_init() calls __nvmet_req_complete() internally upon failure,
> e.g., unsupported opcode, which calls the "queue_response" callback,
> this results in nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() being called, which will
> call nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() if data_len is 0 or if dma_dir is
> different than DMA_TO_DEVICE. This results in a double completion as
> nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() also calls nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod()
> when nvmet_req_init() fails.
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> On the host send a command with an unsupported opcode with nvme-cli,
> For example the admin command "security receive"
> $ sudo nvme security-recv /dev/nvme0n1 -n1 -x4096
> 
> This triggers a double completion as nvmet_req_init() fails and
> nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() is called, here iod->dma_dir is still
> in the default state of "DMA_NONE" as set by default in
> nvmet_pci_epf_alloc_iod(), so nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is called.
> Because nvmet_req_init() failed nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is also
> called in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() leading to a doubple completion.
> 
> This patch lets nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete all failed
> commands, and removes the double completion case in
> nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() therefore fixing the edge cases where
> double completions occurred.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> index a4295a5b8d28..aad828eb72d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> @@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response(struct nvmet_req *req)
>  	iod->status = le16_to_cpu(req->cqe->status) >> 1;
>  
>  	/* If we have no data to transfer, directly complete the command. */

Maybe change this comment to:

	/*
	 * If the command failed or we have no data to transfer, complete
	 * the command immediately.
	 */

Other than this, this looks good, so feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

> -	if (!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> +	if (iod->status || !iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
>  		nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod(iod);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -1604,8 +1604,13 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		goto complete;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If nvmet_req_init() fails (e.g., unsupported opcode) it will call
> +	 * __nvmet_req_complete() internally which will call
> +	 * nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() and will complete the command directly.
> +	 */
>  	if (!nvmet_req_init(req, &iod->sq->nvme_sq, &nvmet_pci_epf_fabrics_ops))
> -		goto complete;
> +		return;
>  
>  	iod->data_len = nvmet_req_transfer_len(req);
>  	if (iod->data_len) {
> @@ -1643,10 +1648,11 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	wait_for_completion(&iod->done);
>  
> -	if (iod->status == NVME_SC_SUCCESS) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> -		nvmet_pci_epf_transfer_iod_data(iod);
> -	}
> +	if (iod->status != NVME_SC_SUCCESS)
> +		return;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!iod->data_len || iod->dma_dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +	nvmet_pci_epf_transfer_iod_data(iod);
>  
>  complete:
>  	nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod(iod);


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails
  2025-07-15  9:18 [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails Rick Wertenbroek
  2025-07-15  9:25 ` Rick Wertenbroek
  2025-07-15 23:14 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2025-07-15 23:22 ` Damien Le Moal
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-07-15 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rick Wertenbroek
  Cc: rick.wertenbroek, alberto.dassatti, Christoph Hellwig,
	Sagi Grimberg, Chaitanya Kulkarni, linux-nvme, linux-kernel

On 7/15/25 18:18, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> Have nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete failed commands.
> 
> Description of the problem:
> nvmet_req_init() calls __nvmet_req_complete() internally upon failure,
> e.g., unsupported opcode, which calls the "queue_response" callback,
> this results in nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() being called, which will
> call nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() if data_len is 0 or if dma_dir is
> different than DMA_TO_DEVICE. This results in a double completion as
> nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() also calls nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod()
> when nvmet_req_init() fails.
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> On the host send a command with an unsupported opcode with nvme-cli,
> For example the admin command "security receive"
> $ sudo nvme security-recv /dev/nvme0n1 -n1 -x4096
> 
> This triggers a double completion as nvmet_req_init() fails and
> nvmet_pci_epf_queue_response() is called, here iod->dma_dir is still
> in the default state of "DMA_NONE" as set by default in
> nvmet_pci_epf_alloc_iod(), so nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is called.
> Because nvmet_req_init() failed nvmet_pci_epf_complete_iod() is also
> called in nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() leading to a doubple completion.
> 
> This patch lets nvmet_req_init() and req->execute() complete all failed
> commands, and removes the double completion case in
> nvmet_pci_epf_exec_iod_work() therefore fixing the edge cases where
> double completions occurred.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>

Forgot: this needs a fixes tag and cc-stable:

Fixes: 0faa0fe6f90e ("nvmet: New NVMe PCI endpoint function target driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-15 23:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-15  9:18 [PATCH] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not complete commands twice if nvmet_req_init() fails Rick Wertenbroek
2025-07-15  9:25 ` Rick Wertenbroek
2025-07-15 23:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-15 23:22 ` Damien Le Moal

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).