From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756022AbaE3QAQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 12:00:16 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:65480 "EHLO mail-vc0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752136AbaE3QAO (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 12:00:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1401449826-30957-1-git-send-email-berthe.ab@gmail.com> References: <20140530094025.3b78301e@canb.auug.org.au> <1401449826-30957-1-git-send-email-berthe.ab@gmail.com> From: Alexandre Courbot Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 00:59:53 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: removes all usage of gpiochip_remove retval To: abdoulaye berthe Cc: Linus Walleij , m@bues.ch, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:37 PM, abdoulaye berthe wrote: > The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent, > especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is still > requested. It is the 1st patch in a serie af 2 patches. the 2nd patch > changes the return value of gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one > updates users of the return value. This comment belongs to a cover letter (PATCH 0/2), not to the first patch of your series. Add --cover-letter to git format-patch to produce one.