From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933389Ab3B0BWq (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:22:46 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:61493 "EHLO mail-ie0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759891Ab3B0BWp (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:22:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130226175311.D17173E2EF8@localhost> References: <1360907177-6468-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <20130226175311.D17173E2EF8@localhost> From: Alexandre Courbot Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:22:24 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpiolib: some fixup patches To: Grant Likely Cc: Linus Walleij , Ryan Mallon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "acourbot@nvidia.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:19:44 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Grant, will you be able to include these for 3.9? They fix code that >> you merged recently, so I'd be glad if they could be squashed into the >> patch mentioned in the description. > > They won't get squashed in because the tree is already composed and in > linux-next. I don't rebase unless I really need to. I've applied them > and I'll probably push to Linus since they are effectively bug fixes of > a sort and the merge window hasn't closed yet. That's fine too - as long as the patches with side-effects are merged. That will allow me to continue going forward with GPIO, thanks! Alex.