From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inlining migrate_disable/enable. Was: [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] x86,bpf: add bpf_global_caller for global trampoline
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 17:20:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADxym3Za-zShEUyoVE7OoODKYXc1nghD63q2xv_wtHAyT2-Z-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQ+5sEDKHdsJY5ZsfGDO_1SEhhQWHrt2SMBG5SYyQ+jt7w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 6:35 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:24 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 09:56:11AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe Peter has better ideas ?
> >
> > Is it possible to express runqueues::nr_pinned as an alias?
> >
> > extern unsigned int __attribute__((alias("runqueues.nr_pinned"))) this_nr_pinned;
> >
> > And use:
> >
> > __this_cpu_inc(&this_nr_pinned);
> >
> >
> > This syntax doesn't actually seem to work; but can we construct
> > something like that?
>
> Yeah. Iant is right. It's a string and not a pointer dereference.
> It never worked.
>
> Few options:
>
> 1.
> struct rq {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + unsigned int nr_pinned;
> +#endif
> /* runqueue lock: */
> raw_spinlock_t __lock;
>
> @@ -1271,9 +1274,6 @@ struct rq {
> struct cpuidle_state *idle_state;
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - unsigned int nr_pinned;
> -#endif
>
> but ugly...
>
> 2.
> static unsigned int nr_pinned_offset __ro_after_init __used;
> RUNTIME_CONST(nr_pinned_offset, nr_pinned_offset)
>
> overkill for what's needed
>
> 3.
> OFFSET(RQ_nr_pinned, rq, nr_pinned);
> then
> #include <generated/asm-offsets.h>
>
> imo the best.
I had a try. The struct rq is not visible to asm-offsets.c, so we
can't define it in arch/xx/kernel/asm-offsets.c. Do you mean
to define a similar rq-offsets.c in kernel/sched/ ? It will be more
complex than the way 2, and I think the second way 2 is
easier :/
>
> 4.
> Maybe we should extend clang/gcc to support attr(preserve_access_index)
> on x86 and other architectures ;)
> We rely heavily on it in bpf backend.
> Then one can simply write:
>
> struct rq___my {
> unsigned int nr_pinned;
> } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>
> struct rq___my *rq;
>
> rq = this_rq();
> rq->nr_pinned++;
>
> and the compiler will do its magic of offset adjustment.
> That's how BPF CORE works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250703121521.1874196-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/18] bpf: add function hash table for tracing-multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-04 16:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 1:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15 2:37 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 2:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15 3:13 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 9:06 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 16:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] x86,bpf: add bpf_global_caller for global trampoline Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 2:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15 8:36 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 9:30 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-16 16:56 ` Inlining migrate_disable/enable. Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 22:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16 22:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-16 22:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-28 9:20 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2025-07-31 16:15 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-08-01 1:42 ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-06 8:44 ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-08 0:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-08-08 5:48 ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-08 6:32 ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-08 15:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15 16:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16 13:05 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-17 0:59 ` multi-fentry proposal. Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-17 1:50 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-17 2:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-17 2:37 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-16 14:40 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/18] ftrace: factor out ftrace_direct_update from register_ftrace_direct Menglong Dong
2025-07-05 2:41 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/18] ftrace: add reset_ftrace_direct_ips Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-04 1:54 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-07 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/18] bpf: introduce bpf_gtramp_link Menglong Dong
2025-07-04 7:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-04 7:52 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/18] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-14 23:45 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 12:50 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/18] bpf: refactor the modules_array to ptr_array Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/18] bpf: verifier: add btf to the function args of bpf_check_attach_target Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/18] bpf: verifier: move btf_id_deny to bpf_check_attach_target Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/18] x86,bpf: factor out arch_bpf_get_regs_nr Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpf: tracing: add multi-link support Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/18] libbpf: don't free btf if tracing_multi progs existing Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15 1:15 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/18] libbpf: support tracing_multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15 1:58 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 12:43 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/18] libbpf: add btf type hash lookup support Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15 4:40 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 11:53 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/18] libbpf: add skip_invalid and attach_tracing for tracing_multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15 5:48 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 11:46 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/18] selftests/bpf: move get_ksyms and get_addrs to trace_helpers.c Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/18] selftests/bpf: add basic testcases for tracing_multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/18] selftests/bpf: add bench tests " Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADxym3Za-zShEUyoVE7OoODKYXc1nghD63q2xv_wtHAyT2-Z-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong.dong@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).