From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755412Ab2CMQbL (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:31:11 -0400 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:52288 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755015Ab2CMQbJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:31:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [24.106.62.130] In-Reply-To: References: <20120221211938.GE12236@google.com> <20120312221050.GG23255@google.com> <1331590938.18960.57.camel@twins> <20120312222817.GI23255@google.com> <1331591568.18960.61.camel@twins> <20120312223944.GJ23255@google.com> <1331592241.18960.64.camel@twins> <20120312230416.GM23255@google.com> <20120313141032.GD29169@redhat.com> From: C Anthony Risinger Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:30:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Tejun Heo , Michal Schmidt , Frederic Weisbecker , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kay Sievers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lennart Poettering , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:11 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > > # what controllers are available for this process? > $ cat /proc/self/tags/TYPE ^^^^^ should list of controllers either assigned to TYPE or not masked by MASK > # explicit assign `users` 50 shares > $ echo 50 > /proc/self/tags/admin.cpuacct.cpu.shares ^^^^^ s,admin,users, > # `name`'s priority relative to sibling `name` groups (like shares) > $ echo 100 > /proc/self/tags/admin.cpuacct.cpu.PRIORITY ^^^^^ maybe redundant, my original reasoning for it escapes me, but could be useful for controllers that accept multiple `name`s -- C Anthony