From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663CCC10F0E for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5872084F for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 10:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726831AbfDIKOK (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 06:14:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:32933 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726001AbfDIKOJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 06:14:09 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id k14so19043158qtb.0; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 03:14:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Kdv7E7EQtES4EqqVPGiQ+deLRkk2VGik0/rCDbn7V0E=; b=JJ+b7KepsXSQTfaL7eUw0LdaVbxcViiHzO2tV04SPjAiQ5APKFFN7DCYlYlFdxiVtv AI+w+zHeQdHsD2Ws5fawRv/vGJ0v5wDC0dyu8WoSSI9My31DhDXdizUcAxN+nFvvM1yZ o5YGxfJGOh5wcwUoKLsaTAm2gG64rTZ5bxP4F9Kz0pHtNKaC+uKqUoH27Ia/FoaBMQSw xRW3c3z9skAjzS639Pk/QEN9P1KDu2gfBS8uMKjiJeiTW6SKcaEh0qnN6ab9lM1SDFG2 lpbdvOqJsxiyRP4H63athh7j22cYUcTe/3Z53e8F3p3oqmK3HWahI5XMajDjgflIrbub oCbg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVzRH5KDtwtS1MByFilZk9mAecCleRxdjjS1SUOI+brbNgIvmrE g4icVypEk48vU0swb3X+ENgJh1P5m0RIzKkhpMY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwpCbGlumwUVi8/Zid+BGHAVH1lHax30gk0+17mJan+98MUN5xy7w9qmB0FavqDrp4wmbEisecVgp+I5gZcrIg= X-Received: by 2002:aed:35e4:: with SMTP id d33mr28977275qte.58.1554804848704; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 03:14:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190408212648.2407234-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190408212648.2407234-5-arnd@arndb.de> <8875e0b6-00b4-884d-fd6a-a5a144543559@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <8875e0b6-00b4-884d-fd6a-a5a144543559@linux.ibm.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:13:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390: zcrypt: initialize variables before_use To: Harald Freudenberger Cc: Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , Nathan Chancellor , linux-s390 , Ingo Franzki , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:54 AM Harald Freudenberger wrote: > On 08.04.19 23:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Thanks Arnd, but as Nathan already wrote, I'd prefer to have the > variable initialized with 0 instead of -1. > If you agree with this, I'll rewrite the patch and apply it to our > internal git and it will appear at kernel org with the next s390 code merge then. That's fine with me, I don't care about the specific value that gets assigned here. Thanks, Arnd