linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 21:37:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCHhxyugMOCeS0hZoEXWhgRec4uOBexZ2aB2A+Eycgi8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529095024.GF11074@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 29 May 2014 11:50, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:53:04PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> If the CPU is used for handling lot of IRQs, trig a load balance to check if
>> it's worth moving its tasks on another CPU that has more capacity
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index e8a30f9..2501e49 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -5948,6 +5948,13 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
>>       if (sgs->sum_nr_running > sgs->group_capacity)
>>               return true;
>>
>> +     /*
>> +      * The group capacity is reduced probably because of activity from other
>> +      * sched class or interrupts which use part of the available capacity
>> +      */
>> +     if ((sg->sgp->power_orig * 100) > (sgs->group_power * env->sd->imbalance_pct))
>> +             return true;
>> +
>>       if (sgs->group_imb)
>>               return true;
>>
>
> But we should already do this because the load numbers are scaled with
> the power/capacity figures. If one CPU gets significant less time to run
> fair tasks, its effective load would spike and it'd get to be selected
> here anyway.
>
> Or am I missing something?

The CPU could have been picked when the capacity becomes null (which
occurred when the cpu_power goes below half the default
SCHED_POWER_SCALE). And even after that, there were some conditions in
find_busiest_group that was bypassing this busiest group

>
>> @@ -7282,6 +7289,12 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
>>
>>               if (nr_busy > 1)
>>                       goto need_kick_unlock;
>> +
>> +             if ((rq->cfs.h_nr_running >= 1)
>> +              && ((rq->cpu_power * sd->imbalance_pct) <
>> +                                     (rq->cpu_power_orig * 100)))
>> +                     goto need_kick_unlock;
>> +
>>       }
>>
>>       sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym, cpu));
>
> OK, so there you're kicking the idle balancer to try and get another CPU
> to pull some load? That makes sense I suppose.

and especially if we have idle CPUs and one task on the CPU with
reduced capacity

>
> That function is pretty horrible though; how about something like this
> first?

ok, i will integrate this modification in next version

>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c9617b73bcc0..47fb96e6fa83 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7215,15 +7215,16 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
>   *   - For SD_ASYM_PACKING, if the lower numbered cpu's in the scheduler
>   *     domain span are idle.
>   */
> -static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
> +static inline bool nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>         unsigned long now = jiffies;
>         struct sched_domain *sd;
>         struct sched_group_power *sgp;
>         int nr_busy, cpu = rq->cpu;
> +       bool kick = false;
>
>         if (unlikely(rq->idle_balance))
> -               return 0;
> +               return false;
>
>         /*
>         * We may be recently in ticked or tickless idle mode. At the first
> @@ -7237,38 +7238,34 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq)
>          * balancing.
>          */
>         if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
> -               return 0;
> +               return false;
>
>         if (time_before(now, nohz.next_balance))
> -               return 0;
> +               return false;
>
>         if (rq->nr_running >= 2)
> -               goto need_kick;
> +               return true;
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
>         sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_busy, cpu));
> -
>         if (sd) {
>                 sgp = sd->groups->sgp;
>                 nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
>
> -               if (nr_busy > 1)
> -                       goto need_kick_unlock;
> +               if (nr_busy > 1) {
> +                       kick = true;
> +                       goto unlock;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym, cpu));
> -
>         if (sd && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
>                                   sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
> -               goto need_kick_unlock;
> -
> -       rcu_read_unlock();
> -       return 0;
> +               kick = true;
>
> -need_kick_unlock:
> +unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
> -need_kick:
> -       return 1;
> +       return kick;
>  }
>  #else
>  static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle) { }

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-29 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-23 15:52 [PATCH v2 00/11] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] sched: fix imbalance flag reset Vincent Guittot
2014-05-25 10:33   ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26  7:49     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26  9:16       ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 10:14         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] sched: remove a wake_affine condition Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 12:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:19     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 15:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 16:14         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28  6:49           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:09             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-28 15:25               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 13:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 13:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:20     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] sched: fix avg_load computation Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 13:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] sched: Allow all archs to set the power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 14:04   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 14:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 20:50     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04  9:42       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-04 11:15         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-05  8:59           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-16  9:01             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 13:22   ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 14:02     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:17       ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-06  7:01         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface Vincent Guittot
2014-05-25 13:22   ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26  8:25     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26  9:19       ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] sched: add per rq cpu_power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] Revert "sched: Put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED" Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] sched: get CPU's activity statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 17:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28  7:01     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 12:10   ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 13:15     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:47       ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 16:39         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 12:03           ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 15:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:41               ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 15:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:20           ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04  7:47           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04  8:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04  8:55               ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04  9:23                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04  9:35                   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 10:25                     ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04  9:44                   ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04  9:32               ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 10:00                 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 10:36                   ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:55                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 11:07                     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:23                       ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 11:52                         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 13:09                           ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 13:23                             ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 15:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:16       ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 17:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 23:11       ` Yuyang Du
2014-05-30  9:50   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 19:20     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-01 11:33       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-02 14:07         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 10:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 11:15     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24  0:34       ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 13:23         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29  9:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:37     ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2014-05-30  6:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 20:05         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 17:06         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 11:15           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 12:31             ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 14:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:44     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 13:26   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 19:24     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 19:45       ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-30 20:07         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] sched: replace capacity by activity Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 13:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:51     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02  6:21     ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-06-03  9:50       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 14:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:56     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30  6:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 19:13         ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26  9:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 10:04   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 15:54     ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27  5:47       ` Preeti U Murthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKfTPtCHhxyugMOCeS0hZoEXWhgRec4uOBexZ2aB2A+Eycgi8w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).