From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757882Ab2IXThI (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:37:08 -0400 Received: from na3sys010aog109.obsmtp.com ([74.125.245.86]:40474 "HELO na3sys010aog109.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757516Ab2IXThG (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:37:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120925000217.947b8cd8dca6979bfedee2ca@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20120925000217.947b8cd8dca6979bfedee2ca@canb.auug.org.au> From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:36:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu , Amir Vadai , Jack Morgenstein , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c: In function 'id_map_alloc': > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c:228:36: error: 'MAX_ID_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) > > Caused by commit d7a4e9b679e9 ("IB/mlx4: Add CM paravirtualization") from > the infiniband tree interacting with commit "idr: rename MAX_LEVEL to > MAX_IDR_LEVEL" from the akpm tree. > > I have added the following merge fix patch for today: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:57:53 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] IB/mlx4: fix for MAX_ID_MASK to MAX_IDR_MASK name change > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c > index e25e4da..80079e5 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c > @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ id_map_alloc(struct ib_device *ibdev, int slave_id, u32 sl_cm_id) > ret = idr_get_new_above(&sriov->pv_id_table, ent, > next_id, &id); > if (!ret) { > - next_id = ((unsigned) id + 1) & MAX_ID_MASK; > + next_id = ((unsigned) id + 1) & MAX_IDR_MASK; > ent->pv_cm_id = (u32)id; > sl_id_map_add(ibdev, ent); > } Andrew, any preference on how to handle this merge? Jack/Amir, I wonder if there's some way we can avoid this code entirely? Is an IDR the right structure to use here, or would we be better off with a radix tree maybe (where we can assign our own ID)? - R.