From: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntp: verify offset doesn't overflow in ntp_update_offset
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:02:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLWEvJJCKA0dS7QFTXy0oA2=NsKRwJ3WbKwfdCXUufxcPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449175608-1146-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
> We need to make sure that the offset is valid before manipulating it,
> otherwise it might overflow on the multiplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/ntp.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/ntp.c b/kernel/time/ntp.c
> index 149cc80..36616c3 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/ntp.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ static void ntp_update_offset(long offset)
> if (!(time_status & STA_PLL))
> return;
>
> + /* Make sure the multiplication below won't overflow */
> + offset = clamp(offset, -MAXPHASE, MAXPHASE);
> +
> if (!(time_status & STA_NANO))
> offset *= NSEC_PER_USEC;
So looking at this a bit closer, this bit looks sort of crazy since we
clam the offset, do the multiply and then do the exact same clamp.
I'd much rather do a more logical clamp(offset, -USEC_PER_SEC,
USEC_PER_SEC), but only in the case where we do the multiply.
Any objection to that?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 20:46 [PATCH] ntp: verify offset doesn't overflow in ntp_update_offset Sasha Levin
2015-12-04 20:26 ` John Stultz
2015-12-08 0:02 ` John Stultz [this message]
2015-12-08 0:22 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALAqxLWEvJJCKA0dS7QFTXy0oA2=NsKRwJ3WbKwfdCXUufxcPA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).