linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>,
	linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/7] arm64/efi: Move uaccess en/disable out of efi_set_pgd()
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:38:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFLZWvEBTX__P6B+3nMn-HZpKaVRkiUmfj35xiG8LH0bQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHEUpiXt-pW7DBAN@willie-the-truck>

On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 23:42, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 07:43:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >
> > efi_set_pgd() will no longer be called when invoking EFI runtime
> > services via the efi_rts_wq work queue, but the uaccess en/disable are
> > still needed when using PAN emulation using TTBR0 switching. So move
> > these into the callers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h | 3 ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c      | 3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> > index decf87777f57..abe9176a3a23 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h
> > @@ -132,15 +132,12 @@ static inline void efi_set_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >                        * exception when invoking the EFI run-time services.
> >                        */
> >                       update_saved_ttbr0(current, mm);
> > -                     uaccess_ttbr0_enable();
> > -                     post_ttbr_update_workaround();
> >               } else {
> >                       /*
> >                        * Defer the switch to the current thread's TTBR0_EL1
> >                        * until uaccess_enable(). Restore the current
> >                        * thread's saved ttbr0 corresponding to its active_mm
> >                        */
> > -                     uaccess_ttbr0_disable();
> >                       update_saved_ttbr0(current, current->active_mm);
> >               }
> >       }
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > index d01ae156bb63..5d188c6c44d7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ bool arch_efi_call_virt_setup(void)
> >               return false;
> >
> >       efi_virtmap_load();
> > +     uaccess_ttbr0_enable();
> > +     post_ttbr_update_workaround();
> >       __efi_fpsimd_begin();
> >       return true;
> >  }
> > @@ -185,6 +187,7 @@ void arch_efi_call_virt_teardown(void)
> >  {
> >       __efi_fpsimd_end();
> >       efi_virtmap_unload();
> > +     uaccess_ttbr0_disable();
>
> Moving this after updating the saved TTBR0 isn't great for SWPAN, as it
> means that if we take an exception (e.g. an IRQ) before calling
> uaccess_ttbr0_disable() then I think we'll end up running with the user
> page-table installed briefly in TTBR0 which SWPAN is supposed to prevent
> outside of genuine uaccess sections.
>

OK, I'll respin this to take that into account.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-14 17:43 [RFC PATCH 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] efi: Add missing static initializer for efi_mm::cpus_allowed_lock Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] efi/runtime: Return success/failure from arch_efi_call_virt_setup() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] efi/runtime: Deal with arch_efi_call_virt_setup() returning failure Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] arm64/fpsimd: Don't warn when EFI execution context is preemptible Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] arm64/efi: Use a semaphore to protect the EFI stack and FP/SIMD state Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] arm64/efi: Move uaccess en/disable out of efi_set_pgd() Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-11 13:41   ` Will Deacon
2025-07-14  6:38     ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2025-05-14 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] arm64/efi: Call EFI runtime services without disabling preemption Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-11 13:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-14  2:20     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-14 10:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-15  0:46         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-07-11 13:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] arm64: Make EFI calls preemptible Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMj1kXFLZWvEBTX__P6B+3nMn-HZpKaVRkiUmfj35xiG8LH0bQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb+git@google.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).