From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754109AbaKOMcG (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:32:06 -0500 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:39204 "EHLO mail-la0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753621AbaKOMcD (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:32:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ha93t8z1q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1415917702-6742-1-git-send-email-khilman@kernel.org> <1415917702-6742-2-git-send-email-khilman@kernel.org> <7ha93t8z1q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:32:01 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PzskP1_cUVi6-97wCNvSqMjXnOM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / domains: Kconfig: always enable PM_RUNTIME when genpd enabled From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Kevin Hilman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ulf Hansson , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PM list , linaro-kernel , Grygorii Strashko , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Kevin, On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>> It makes little sense to use generic power domains without runtime PM. >> >> Does it? >> It still powers down the PM domains on system suspend (at least on my >> boards ;-) > > Sure, but your devices are also using runtime PM, so I'm not sure how > does that change my statement above? I do mean with CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME turned off. If PM domain support is disabled, s2ram will not power down the PM domains. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds